Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 709592
Some Problems concerning the Reading of the CIL 3, 12813
Some Problems concerning the Reading of the CIL 3, 12813 // Lucius Artorius Castus and the king Arthur legend: proceedings of the International Scholarly Conference from 30th of march to 2th of April 2012. / Lucije Artorije Kast i legenda o kralju Arturu: zbornik radova s međunarodnog znanstvenog skupa držanog u Podstrani 30. ožujka do 2. travnja 2012. / Cambi, Nenad (ur.).
Split: Književni krug Split, 2014. str. 131-143 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 709592 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Some Problems concerning the Reading of the CIL 3, 12813
Autori
Kurilić, Anamarija
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Lucius Artorius Castus and the king Arthur legend: proceedings of the International Scholarly Conference from 30th of march to 2th of April 2012. / Lucije Artorije Kast i legenda o kralju Arturu: zbornik radova s međunarodnog znanstvenog skupa držanog u Podstrani 30. ožujka do 2. travnja 2012.
/ Cambi, Nenad - Split : Književni krug Split, 2014, 131-143
ISBN
978-953-163-401-4
Skup
Međunarodni znanstveni skup "Lucius Artorius Castus, čimbenik u stvaranju mira o kralju Arturu i Podstrana u antici", Podstrana, 31. 3. - 1. 4. 2012.
Mjesto i datum
Podstrana, Hrvatska, 31.03.2012. - 01.04.2012
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Roman Dalmatia ; L. Artorius Castus ; Latin Epigraphy ; Sepulchral Inscriptions ; Epigraphic Standards
Sažetak
The author analyses the content of the CIL 3, 12813 (= 8513 = 1919) inscription set up by L. Artorius Castus and examines the way in which the text was composed and carved, especially the way in which his career was presented. The text itself deviates from epigraphic standards used in sepulchral inscriptions beginning with the dedicatory formula 'Dis Manibus'. In such inscriptions, after the dedicatory formula comes the name of the deceased, usually in the Dative case. The deceased's career and/or their personal qualities are also in the Dative case. Commemorator's name is usually in the Nominative case. Since this is the monument set up by Castus himself while he was still alive (vivus ipse sibi et su[is]), so his name is in the Nominative case. The same case should have been used for his career, but, instead, it is in the Dative case. The author shall examine that irregularity, which not only does deviate from the epigraphic standards but also ignores the rules of the Latin grammar. She will discuss the possibilities that we might be dealing either with a systematic error committed by the inscription's author, or with his ignorance of the Latin language or with something else.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filologija, Povijest, Arheologija
