Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 692901
Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems
Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems // Focus 2020: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on organizational Science Development / Balantič, Zvone et al. (ur.).
Kranj: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede Univerze v Mariboru, 2014. str. 564-570 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 692901 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Group Assessment of Learning Management Systems
Autori
Pipan, Matic ; Arh, Tanja ; Srdjevic, Zorica ; Srdjevic, Bojan ; Balaban, Igor
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Focus 2020: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on organizational Science Development
/ Balantič, Zvone et al. - Kranj : Fakulteta za organizacijske vede Univerze v Mariboru, 2014, 564-570
ISBN
978-961-232-274-8
Skup
33rd international conference on organizational Science Development Slovenia
Mjesto i datum
Portorož, Slovenija, 19.03.2014. - 21.03.2014
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
learning management system; analytic hierarchy process; DEXi; group decision making; consistency measures
Sažetak
In our earlier works (Srdjevic et al., 2012 ; Pipan et al., 2013) it was shown that if there are several available Learning Management Systems (LMS), a multi-criteria method AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) or DEXi multi-criteria model can be used to support decision maker in selecting the most suitable system. The decision making results of the application obtained by the individual expert using above mentioned methods have been already compared and published in Pipan et al. (2013). Here we extend an approach to group assessment. Three experts from the Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) domain evaluated the same three LMSs against five typical criteria and their individual decisions were aggregated geometrically to obtain the final group decision. Unbiased weighting of decision makers is assumed and the consistency indicators were checked for each decision maker to justify associated equal weights and preserve that the final decision was correctly derived.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Fakultet organizacije i informatike, Varaždin
Profili:
Igor Balaban
(autor)