аЯрЁБс>ўџ knўџџџlџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџьЅСq ПЏ9bjbjt+t+ (zAAW/џџџџџџ]””””8Ьр<”ІЖ04JJJJJJВДДД=ёš‹š%$\єP lI]JJJJJIJJJ0JJJJJJВ@T@JВJhJВВJ д‰Щ…Р””JВProceedings of the IX Baltic Geotechnical Conference 10-12 May 2000 Parnu, Estonia Sa~etak je u prilogu Damir ORKO M.Sc., C.E., CONEX, Zagreb, Treanjevac 19 Davorin KOVA I Ph.D., C. E., BBR CONEX, Zagreb, Treanjevac 15 Bo~ica MARI M.Sc., C.E., CONEX, Zagreb, Treanjevac 19 Davorin LOVREN I B.Sc.,C. E., CONEX, Zagreb, Treanjevac 19 FOUNDATIONS STRUCTURE OF THE  DUBROVNIK BRIDGE SUMMARY The bridge across the long and narrow Rijeka Dubrova ka bay consists of two different superstructure elements. A 147,4 meter long west viaduct in prestressed concrete is supported by a pier and by an abutment. An adjacent main 334 meter long composite cable-stayed bridge is suspended on a pylon and supported by an abutment. The main span of the bridge is 304 m. The bridge is situated in an area of very high seismic activity. In interaction with bridge span this yields extremely high forces which should be transmitted to the ground. The geomorphological features of the site at the position of supports make the foundation problems even worse. The resulting solution requires rather demanding foundation structure. The paper presents the basic features of the foundation design. 1. INTRODUCTION The bridge across the Rijeka Dubrova ka bay is designed with four supports: an abutment on the Split side and another abutment on the Dubrovnik side and a pylon on the Split side and a pylon on the Dubrovnik side. The bridge is situated in an area of high seismic activity. Taking into consideration the planned position of bridge superstructure,the resulting forces that should be transmitted to the ground are extremely unfavourable. The selected foundations design required a rather demanding foundation structure. A whole series of calculations for different foundation options had to be done to find an appropriate solution for the foundations and to select the structure which could take the resulting forces and transfer them to the ground. View of the bridge is shown in Fig. 1. Fig. 1 Schematic drawing of the Dubrovnik bridge 2. GEOMECHANICS INVESTIGATION WORKS Geomechanics investigation works needed for preparation of the design and for work on the foundations were performed by the  Institut graevinarstva Hrvatske d.d., Zavod za geotehniku, Zagreb. (Croatian Civil Engineering Institute d.d., Geotechnical Department, Zagreb). The investigation works confirmed that the ground on the site consists of layered massive limestones and dolomitic limestones with occasional thin limestone layers. Occurrences of apparently thinly layered limestones formed as a result of decomposition of thick limestone layers along parallelly stratified planes are frequent. In addition to faulting, limestones are extremely fractured and mylonitized. Fractures can be grouped into (more than four) systems, which indicates complex tectonics. Extremely high open joints are frequent on wavy and serrated planes of fractures formed by strike slips (particularly evident on the Split side). In general, layers (systems of fractures) on the Dubrovnik side are of relatively unfavourable strike (dip towards the sea). The situation is reverse on the Split side. A particular problem for foundations of the pier and the pylon is their location immediately at the sea shore, which creates problems in excavation work, i.e. require protection of excavations and prevention of of sea water impact. The abutment on the Dubrovnik side is located at the top of a steep slope, which additionally aggravates its stability. The abutment on the Split side was constructed earlier and is not the subject of this paper. 3. FOUNDATIONS STRUCTURE 3.1 Pier on the Split side Three possible solutions for foundations of this pier were analysed: 1. Foundations on reinforced concrete block 23,0 m long, 15,0 m wide and 6,00 m thick. The depth of foundations should be at elevation –4,50 meters above sea level. Excavation of such a deep pit, practically in the sea, would be an almost impossible task and the solution was abandoned. 2. Foundations on a block whose upper part consists of 22,60 x 13,60 x 4,0 m reinforced concrete cap and bedrock with 160 micro-piles 10,0 m long. The role of micro-piles is to keep together bedrock mass and ensure joint action of the foundation block system. The drawback of that solution is that - in addition to all above work - approx. 5,0 m of the upper layer of the bedrock would have to be grouted. 3. Foundations on a block which consists of reinforced concrete cap with a system of 40 drilled 1100 mm diameter piles and on the rock which surrounds the piles. This solution proved to be acceptable. Work according to that solution was carried out without major problems in a very acceptable period of time. Fig. 1 Selected pier foundations design on the Split side 3.2 Pylon on the Dubrovnik side Foundation of the pylon is also near the sea shore, but still some distance away from it and the solution with foundations on a massive 6,0 m thick (final solution), 15,50 m wide and 15,0 m long reinforced concrete block was accepted. A 4,0 x 3,0 m beam connects two such blocks. Installation of 20 prestressed permanent geotechnical anchors (with locations for additional anchors) is also planned for additional safety of foundations. All anchors are designed for 1000 kN loads. In view of the required anchor durability, particularly critical in seawater immersion conditions, the design anticipates installation of carbon fibre anchors – CFRP (Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer) from the range of products of BBR Switzerland. Anchors consist of 43 wires и 5 mm (Fw = 19,6 mm2). The basic characteristics of anchors are as follows: (f = 2,40 kN/mm2 E = 160 kN/mm2 Nw = 47,04 kN Nanchor = 2022,72 (nominal safety factor is Fs ( 2,0) Development of carbon fibre anchors is certainly a large step forward in the solution of corrosion problems (corrosion is the most evident problem in permanent anchors). Therefore, the use of highly durable anchors - particularly in such conditions - should not be a matter of debate. We believe that such anchors will become a widely accepted standard. Protection of the foundation pit (4,5 m below the sea surface) was a problem. Solution of that problem is based on a grout curtain around the whole pit, with grouting depth at approx. 25,0 m. The work has been successfully completed. Fig. 2 Selected pylon foundations design on the Dubrovnik side 3.3 Abutment on the Dubrovnik side Design of abutment foundation on the Dubrovnik side required the solution of a number of problems, which included exceptionally high loads that should be transmitted to the abutment, very unfavourable location (at the top of an extremely steep slope) and safety of existing houses just below the abutment. Insufficient stability of the slope, particularly in the case of earthquake (very strong in this region) additionally complicated the problem. Two basic solutions were discussed: 1. Protection of foundation base by grouting. Clayey fill of the fractured rock system and strict requirements imposed on grouting operations called for the use of super fine cements (with pumpability almost at the level of chemical suspensions) and demanded rather complex work procedures. Prohibitive costs and time consuming considerations eliminated this solution. 2. Foundations on a block formed by bedrock with a system of 40 drilled 1100 mm diameter piles. Two options were analyzed – one with 17,5 m long piles (technological limit in this case) and another with 10,0 m long piles. In both cases prestressed anchors provide stability of the slope. Naturally, to ensure required durability only CFRP anchors will be used. If longer piles are to be used - the number of anchors is about 20 and in the case of shorter piles - about 40. At the time of preparation of this paper the option with shorter piles prevailed, primarily due to the technological problems involved in installation of long and heavy reinforcement cages in an extremely unfavourable location. The selected solution for foundations of the abutment on the Dubrovnik side is shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3 Foundations of the abutment on the Dubrovnik side 4. MONITORING OF FOUNDATIONS In view of task (foundations) complexity, displacements of foundations will be monitored both in the construction phase and during bridge operation. It is necessary to install instruments for measurement of vertical and horizontal displacements of the foundations and of the slope itself. Depending on the location of the foundation element a certain number of micrometers, deformeters and clinometers was installed. 20 to 30 m long micrometers and deformeters were installed in vertical and horizontal boreholes to measure displacements at one meter intervals with an accuracy of 0,03 mm/m. Clinometers were installed directly on reinforced structure of the abutment. In addition, control of integrity and continuity of pile cross-sections as well as measurement of forces in prestressed anchors is also planned. Naturally, appropriate geodetic control of the structure is also anticipated. 5. CONCLUSION The paper presents only the basic features of the foundation design for that immense bridge in an unfavourable location primarily due to possibility of extremely strong earthquakes. As an illustration of earthquake intensity, design earthquake acceleration of 0,39 g speaks for itself. The impact of sea water as an aggressive (corrosive) element on foundations structure is an important problem. This was the reason for prescribing particularly strict conditions for concrete preparation, placement and curing, which also apply to relevant structural details. In addition, the limited space for construction activities (and consequrent safety and protection considerations) additionally complicats execution of the task. At the time of preparation of this paper the largest part of the foundation work was completed. All the piles and foundation blocks on the Split side and Dubrovnik side, as well as abutments has been completed. Driving of piles was a specific experience. Piles were driven partly through fractured and partly through massive (over 1 metre thick) limestone layers. The rate of progress of one (fully completed) pile per day in such conditions can be considered a good result. Drilling for installation of monitoring instruments and preparation of geotechnical anchors is in progress. Walter Bau – Konstruktor d.o.o. (Joint Venture) is in charge of bridge construction, together with specialized subcontractors. References "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pier P2 and pylon; geostatic analyses, No. 2/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pier P2 - option I: geostatic analyses, No. 9/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pier P2 - option II; geostatic analyses, No. 10/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pylon - option II; geostatic analyses, No. 11/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pier P2; main and detailed design; No. 12/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pylon; main and detailed design, No. 15/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pier P2 - micro-pile option; main and detailed design, No. 29/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of the Dubrovnik abutment - grouting option; main and detailed design, No. 39/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of pylon; additional geostatic analyses, No. 87/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of the Dubrovnik abutment; option with piles, main and detailed design, No. 99/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of the Dubrovnik abutment - option with piles; main and detailed design for slope stability, Study No. 109/99 "CONEX" - "Dubrovnik Bridge", Foundations of the Dubrovnik abutment - correction of geostatic analyses, No. 130/99 BBR Review; Introducing BBR CARBON STAY Technology, November 1996 BBR Review; BBR CARBON Cables Technology; Current Projects, May 1998 BBR Review; Special Report on executed applications of BBR CARBON Cables Technology, January 1999 PAGE 6 hlˆŒЈЌдкђFfФм2VЎ"І Ж :œ шuЊёх @@ A K L ‡ ˆ ‰ – — І Ї Љ Њ З Н у ф х ц C#‚#„#Ї#Р)С)!*%*^*`*}*Ї*Ј*..р2с2В3Н3О3~55ж5з5D6E6П6Р6˜7™78§§§§њњјњѓњјњјјњяњыњчњуњнчњуњуњчњчњчњзњяњыњњњјјјјњдададададад5CJCJ jЛ№mH  js№mH H*mH H*mH 5mH 6mH CJmH 5mH CJRlŒЌжикђFfФо2VЊЌЎ"$ќ ў c d Є §§§§§љѕ№ѕ№№№ѕ№№№ѕыычыыыыыы„ў$„ў$„ў„ў„ўlŒЌжикђFfФо2VЊЌЎ"$ќ ў c d Є І Ж З Ќ Ў эю*,.02468:œž шъ  ЮЯwxГЕžstuŽЊЋ№ёЉЊпрстуфх @AY[#$O P … † ˜ Ј Ж ь э O"P"ќќќќљієєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєєє`Є І Ж З Ќ Ў эю*,.02468:œž шъ  ЮЯwxГњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњіњњњњњњњњњњњ„ў$„ўГЕžstuŽЊЋ№ёЉЊпрстуфх @Aњњњњњњњњњњњњіііііііііііёііі$„ў„ў$„ўAY[#$O P … † ˜ Ј Ж ь э O"P":#;#<#=#>#?#@#A#B#C#‚#їїїїїїїїїїяяыїїїїїїїїїїїїт $„ў„„„ў„ў„„а„ў„„P":#;#<#=#>#?#@#A#B#C#‚#ƒ#„#Ї#Ј#i%Ž%%''Р)С)!*"*#*$*%*^*_*`*}*~* +Ё+--Џ-А-ў-џ-...///C0D0ц0ч0К1Л1У2Ф21323Б3В3Н3О34y4й475‘5щ5W6в6/7Ћ7C8Ж8ј8=9Ÿ9 9Ћ9Ќ9Џ9§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§ћјѕѓѓM‚#ƒ#„#Ї#Ј#i%Ž%%''Р)С)!*"*#*$*%*^*_*`*}*~* +Ё+--їїїїїїїѓїѓъцсссснсссссссс„ў$„ў„ў $„ў„Х„;§„ў„ў„„-Џ-А-ў-џ-...///C0D0ц0ч0К1Л1У2Ф21323Б3В3Н3О34y4й475‘5щ5њњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњњіњњњњњњњ„ў$„ўщ5W6в6/7Ћ7C8Ж8ј8=9Ÿ9 9Ћ9Ќ9­9Ў9Џ9њњњњњњњњњёъцффё„h&`„јџ„ $„ў„Х„;§$„ў88ž9 9Ё9Ї9Ј9Љ9Њ9Ћ9Џ9ћјёюёщёю0JmH0J j0JUCJ5CJ & 00PА‚. АЦA!А"А# $ %А [4@ёџ4NormalCJOJQJkHфmH 4@4 Heading 1$$5mH4@4 Heading 2$$6mH4@4 Heading 3$$5mH<A@ђџЁ<Default Paragraph Font:P@ђ: Body Text 2 $„Х„;§mH.B@. Body Text$mH, @,Footer  Ц9r &)@Ђ!& Page Numberf/zџџџџ џџ џџ џџ џџ џџ џџЅk !З#f/$ 8Џ92<Є ГA‚#-щ5Џ935679:;P"Џ948f/ !”џ•€џџZelimir VeinovicC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Dub-litv.docџ@EPSON Stylus Photo 700LPT1:EPIJNL10EPSON Stylus Photo 700EPSON Stylus Photo 700”‹€ š 4hh!DLLName16=EPIGUI27.DLLDLLName32=EPIDA220.DLLEPSON Stylus Photo 700hh ј№ ј№ d2џ4š EPSON Stylus Photo 700”‹€ š 4hh!DLLName16=EPIGUI27.DLLDLLName32=EPIDA220.DLLEPSON Stylus Photo 700hh ј№ ј№ d2џ4š €UU0Яt%UUXЗЗЗЗ f/@@@@@ @@@@(@G‡:џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡:џArial"ˆаh“[JFIКQFй 'ƒS$„ЅРДД€0№/)џџ Damir CorkoInAgipZelimir Veinovicўџ р…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0|˜ЌИШдрє  8 D P\dltт Damir CorkoamiInAgiponAgnAg Normal.dotZelimir Veinovicd3liMicrosoft Word 8.0@FУ#@К5б…3Р@іДН…Рй 'ўџ еЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎX hp€ˆ˜  ЈАИ Р итInAgipS№/1  Damir Corko Title Damir Corko˜ 6> _PID_GUIDтAN{4914F260-F10F-11D4-B656-00C0DF2637A9}  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=ўџџџ?@ABCDEўџџџGHIJKLMўџџџOPQRSTUўџџџ§џџџXўџџџўџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџRoot Entryџџџџџџџџ РF`Ql …Р€šЩ…РZ€1Tableџџџџџџџџџџџџ>WordDocumentџџџџџџџџ(zSummaryInformation(џџџџFDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџNCompObjџџџџjObjectPoolџџџџџџџџџџџџ€šЩ…Р€šЩ…Рџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вqўџ р…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0|˜ЌИШдрє  8 D P\dltт Damir CorkoamiInAgiponAgnAg Normal.dotZelimir Veinovicd4liMicrosoft Word 8.0@ @К5б…3Р@ЈV…Рй 'ўџ еЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎX hp€ˆ˜  ЈАИ Р итInAgipS№/1  Damir Corko Title Damir Corko˜ 6> _PID_GUIDтAN{4914F260-F10F-11D4-B656-00C0DF2637A9}& 00PА‚. АЦA!А"А# $ %АFoundations Structure Of The  Dubrovnik Bridge 2 щ5W6в6/7Ћ7C8Ж8ј8=9Ÿ9 9Ћ9Ќ9­9Ў9Џ9Šzњњњњњњњњњёъцффёё„h&`„јџ„ $„ў„Х„;§$„ў88ž9 9Ё9Ї9Ј9Љ9Њ9Ћ9Џ9†zˆzŠzћјёюёщёюфщCJmH 0JmH0J j0JUCJ5CJ  [4@ёџ4NormalCJOJQJkHфmH 4@4 Heading 1$$5mH4@4 Heading 2$$6mH4@4 Heading 3$$5mH<A@ђџЁ<Default Paragraph Font:P@ђ: Body Text 2 $„Х„;§mH.B@. Body Text$mH, @,Footer  Ц9r &)@Ђ!& Page NumberO/zџџџџ џџ џџ џџ џџ џџ џџŽT њ  #O/$6FVbŒœЫи>?@pqrz{чшLMŸ vwŽЕЖЗИЙКЛМНюя№% & n o   Ў#Џ#Ю$Я$у%ф%†&‡&Z'['c(d(б(в(Q)R)])^)Л)*y*з*1+‰+ї+r,Я,K-у-V.˜.н.?/@/K/P/t dIt dIt dIt `Ъt œЌt `Ъt œЌt `Ъt œЌt `Ъt œЌt œЌt œЌt „7t œЌt œЌt `Ъt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt `Ъt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt ˆЖt œЌt œЌt `Ъt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt œЌt `Ъt œЌt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt њt œЌ„œЌt œЌVb@p?/@/K/P/ž€€€€ž€€€€ž€€˜€€š€€š€€ 8Šz2<Є ГA‚#-щ5Šz35679:;P"Џ948џџUnknownZelimir VeinovicO/ !”џ•€џџZelimir VeinovicC:\WINDOWS\Desktop\Dub-litv.docZelimir Veinovic1C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\AutoRecovery save of Dub-litv.asdџ@EPSON Stylus Photo 700LPT1:EPIJNL10EPSON Stylus Photo 700EPSON Stylus Photo 700”‹€ š 4hh!DLLName16=EPIGUI27.DLLDLLName32=EPIDA220.DLLEPSON Stylus Photo 700hh ј№ ј№ d2џ4š EPSON Stylus Photo 700”‹€ š 4hh!DLLName16=EPIGUI27.DLLDLLName32=EPIDA220.DLLEPSON Stylus Photo 700hh ј№ ј№ d2џ4š €VVt|dюVVФVщ@oщ     ?/@/H/I/M/N/O/@@к@A(z@ @@@ @@@@(@@\s@A@s@A†z@Rs@@Zs@@\s@G‡:џTimes New Roman5€Symbol3& ‡:џArial"ˆаh“[JF КQFй 'ƒS!„ЅРДД€0№/)џџ Damir CorkoInAgipZelimir Veinovic { document.loginьЅСq ПЏ9bjbjt+t+ |AA@/џџџџџџ]”Tœœœ8дш<шиЖp t Š Š Š Š Š Š x z z z =З šQ šы $Žє‚lЩŠ Š Š Š Š Š Š Š 8 8Š Š Š Š Š Š x @T@Š x Š юŠ x x Š $ РYЧ]…РшДœŠ x Root Entryџџџџџџџџ РF`Ql …РРYЧ]…Рp@1Tableџџџџџџџџ>WordDocumentџџџџџџџџi|SummaryInformation(џџџџ Ќџџџџџџџџ  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:^џџџџџџџџџџџџ?@ABCDEўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџўџџџ_]abcdefghўџџџjm§џџџўџџџўџџџqoўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџDocumentSummaryInformation8џџџџџџџџџџџџ№CompObjџџџџjObjectPoolџџџџџџџџџџџџ€šЩ…Р€šЩ…Р0Tableџџџџџџџџџџџџ`юўџџџ ўџџџ ўџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ _PID_GUIDтAN{4914F260-F10F-11D4-B656-00C0DF2637A9}ўџ р…ŸђљOhЋ‘+'Гй0|˜ЌИШдрє  8 D P\dltт Damir CorkoamiInAgiponAgnAg Normal.dotZelimir Veinovicd4liMicrosoft Word 8.0@ @К5б…3Рўџ џџџџ РFMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8є9Вqўџ еЭеœ.“—+,љЎDеЭеœ.“—+,љЎX hp€ˆ˜  ЈАИ Р итInAgipS№/1  Damir Corko Title Damir Corko˜ 6>@ЈV…Рй '