Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 658231
Cognitive and Metacognitive Writing Processes in Students of Different Educational Level
Cognitive and Metacognitive Writing Processes in Students of Different Educational Level // Literacy without Boundaries - Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Reading / Shiel, Gerry ; Stričević, Ivanka ; Sabolović-Krajina, Dijana (ur.).
Zagreb: Hrvatsko čitateljsko društvo, 2007. str. 133-137 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 658231 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Cognitive and Metacognitive Writing Processes in Students of Different Educational Level
Autori
Nikčević-Milković, Anela
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Literacy without Boundaries - Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Reading
/ Shiel, Gerry ; Stričević, Ivanka ; Sabolović-Krajina, Dijana - Zagreb : Hrvatsko čitateljsko društvo, 2007, 133-137
ISBN
978-953-97433-3-6
Skup
Literacy without Boundaries - Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Reading
Mjesto i datum
Zagreb, Hrvatska, 08.2005
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
cognitive and metacognitive processes; essays by students; text quality
Sažetak
The aim of this paper is to describe cognitive and metacognitive processes in the Flower and Hayes Model (1983). We also examine text quality (essays by students who are future teachers and for whom writing is a crucial ability) and how students use two most important writing essays by students to achieve quality. Our results show that text quality is better for students from Fourth year than students from First year (t=4.135 ; p<0.05). It is concluded that students from Fourth year have more practice in writing than students from First year, and that this contributed to improvement in writing. When we analys e the results graphically, we see that there isn’t much different in use of writing strategies between student groups (First and Fourth year students). We see some differences in the area of planning in that Fourth year students produce better written plans than 1st year students. Focus group outcomes tell us that students know relatively little about writing processes and writing strategies. However, they showed interest in the topic, and considered knowledge of writing processes to be very useful for improving writing. They indicated that they would like to have some lectures and training in the writing process and on writing strategy use during their education.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski