Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 654255
The Political Discourse on Croatia’s EU Accession: a Rhetorical Analysis of the Presentation of the European Union among Supporters and Opponents of the EU
The Political Discourse on Croatia’s EU Accession: a Rhetorical Analysis of the Presentation of the European Union among Supporters and Opponents of the EU // What Do We Know About The World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives / Kišiček, Gabrijela ; Žagar, Ž. Igor (ur.).
Windsor: University of Windsor, 2013. str. 204-233
CROSBI ID: 654255 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Political Discourse on Croatia’s EU Accession: a Rhetorical Analysis of the Presentation of the European Union among Supporters and Opponents of the EU
Autori
Kišiček, Gabrijela
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Poglavlja u knjigama, znanstveni
Knjiga
What Do We Know About The World? Rhetorical and Argumentative Perspectives
Urednik/ci
Kišiček, Gabrijela ; Žagar, Ž. Igor
Izdavač
University of Windsor
Grad
Windsor
Godina
2013
Raspon stranica
204-233
ISBN
978-0-920233-70
Ključne riječi
argumentation, fallacies, political discourse, Europhobes, Europhiles
Sažetak
This article describes salient argumentation strategies used in speeches of members of the political majority in support of Croatian EU membership as well as and those who opposed it. The analysis includes the usage of ideologically marked words, expressive terms with emotional value, and figures of speech, particularly metaphor. Corpora for this research were political speeches broadcast on television and radio collected over a period of 3 months, including the most important political figures of the previous and the present government as well as representatives of “Europhobes, ” such as leaders of right wing political parties and civil organizations. The main goal of the analysis is to determine what kinds of arguments are frequently used, which fallacies are most frequent, and what are the differences and similarities in rhetorical means and argumentative strategies between two opposed sides? Analysis showed very weak argumentation and frequent use of appeals to emotions, especially appeal to fear, for both supporters and opponents to EU.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski