Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 555605
HOHFELD'S CONCEPT OF IMMUNITY
HOHFELD'S CONCEPT OF IMMUNITY // LegArg 2011 International Conference on Legal Theory and Legal Argumentation
Nova Gorica, Slovenija, 2011. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 555605 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
HOHFELD'S CONCEPT OF IMMUNITY
(HOHFELD'S CONCEPT OF IMMUNITYHOHFELD'S CONCEPT OF IMMUNITY)
Autori
Tucak, Ivana
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni
Skup
LegArg 2011 International Conference on Legal Theory and Legal Argumentation
Mjesto i datum
Nova Gorica, Slovenija, 11.11.2011. - 12.11.2011
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
immunity; constitutional rights
Sažetak
The topic of this paper is analysis of Hohfeld’s concept of immunity. The paper is divided into three sections. The first part includes analysis and evaluation of Hohfeld’s concept of immunity. The main goal of this section is to outline using existing knowledge what is relevant and still not satisfying in Hohfeld’s concept of immunity and how these flaws can be corrected. The second part reviews contemporary debates on Hohfeld’s concept of immunity. Arguments for and against inclusion of immunity into a type of legal rights are investigated in this part. The third part is aimed at showing that it is not possible to analyse some extremely relevant constitutional rights without the concept of immunity. Hohfeld’s fundamental legal concepts enable precise interpretation of what is understood by people when they require their rights. The concept of Hohfeldian immunity is useful for denoting a specific status of citizens protected from a particular harmful change by means of constitutional restraints or by the disability of the legislator. Unlike the relation right-duty which refers to required conduct, the relation immunity-disability is characterized by conduct which cannot bring to legal changes. The concept of immunity is irreplaceable when it comes to the ’’rights’’ of citizens not to be deprived of their property or freedoms without due process of law, then when it comes to the right to freedom of speech, the right to freedom of confession, the principle ne bis in idem.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
111-1111174-0986 - Zaštita prava manjina u međunarodnom pravu i nacionalnim zakonodavstvima (Lulić, Mira, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Osijek
Profili:
Ivana Tucak
(autor)