Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 55445
Comparison of Different Soil Tillage Systems in Maize and Winter Wheat Production
Comparison of Different Soil Tillage Systems in Maize and Winter Wheat Production // Innovation of Agricultural Engineering Technologies for the 21st Century / Zeng, Dechao ; Wang, Maohua (ur.).
Peking: China Agricultural University Press, 1999. str. 250-254 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 55445 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Different Soil Tillage Systems in Maize and Winter Wheat Production
Autori
Košutić, Silvio ; Filipović, Dubravko ; Gospodarić, Zlatko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Innovation of Agricultural Engineering Technologies for the 21st Century
/ Zeng, Dechao ; Wang, Maohua - Peking : China Agricultural University Press, 1999, 250-254
Skup
International Conference on Agricultural Engineering
Mjesto i datum
Peking, Kina, 14.12.1999. - 17.12.1999
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Soil tillage systems; maize; winter wheat; yield; energy
Sažetak
Five soil tillage systems were compared during 1996-1998 in maize and winter wheat production on anthropogenic Luvisol in north-west Slavonia, Croatia. Tillage systems and implements were: 1. conventional system - plough, discharrow and combined implement (CT), 2. reduced conventional system - plough and combined implement (RCT), 3. conservation system I - chisel plough and power harrow (CPH), 4. conservation system II - chisel plough and multitiller (CMT), 5. direct drilling - direct drill (DD). The aim of testing was comparison of different tillage systems energy requirement and its influence on yield. Results indicate that conventional tillage system was the greatest energy consumer. Comparing to conventional tillage system, reduced system with plough and combined implement required 16.1% less, conservation system I with chisel plough and power harrow 26.9% less, conservation system II with chisel plough and multitiller 40.8% less, while no-till system required even 85.1% less energy per hectare. The greatest yield of maize, 7.78 t/ha, achieved conventional tillage system while next to it was conservation system II with 7.77 t/ha. No-till system achieved 7.56 t/ha, while conservation system I achieved yield of 7.54 t/ha. The lowest maize yield of 7.17 t/ha achieved reduced system. Second year the greatest yield of winter wheat, 5.89 t/ha, achieved conservation tillage system II. Next to it was conventional system with 5.75 t/ha. No-till achieved 5.73 t/ha, while conservation system I achieved yield of 5.51 t/ha. The lowest yield of 5.27 t/ha achieved reduced system.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski