Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 543023
The Ill-treatment of Prisoners in Europe: a Disease Diagnosed but not Cured?
The Ill-treatment of Prisoners in Europe: a Disease Diagnosed but not Cured? // Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 30 (2009), 2; 1108-1128 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 543023 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Ill-treatment of Prisoners in Europe: a Disease Diagnosed but not Cured?
Autori
Marochini, Maša
Izvornik
Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci (1330-349X) 30
(2009), 2;
1108-1128
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
European Court of Human Rights; Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights; ill-treatment of prisoners; Committee for the Prevention of Torture; Protocol No. 14
Sažetak
This article considers of the issue of preventing prisoners from being ill-treated within the Council of Europe’s system for the protection of human rights. The reason for tackling this topic lies in the fact that there have been some great changes in the protection of prisoners within the last 10 years. The biggest roles in creating better protection have been taken by the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter ECtHR) and the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (hereinafter CPT). ECtHR has extended the interpretation of Article 3 of the European Convention for Human Rights (ECHR), while the CPT has generated some new standards that now directly influence the work of ECtHR. The Court had been reluctant to engage Article 3 to address the question of conditions of detention and preventive health care in prisons ; it had always been focused on cases of deliberate ill-treatment by authorities towards detainees. However, the situation has changed within the last decade. The Court has drastically extended its interpretation of what constitutes violation of Article 3 and it is now relying on CPT reports when determining whether ill-treatment occurred. This new approach in the ECtHR’s jurisprudence now provides a potential tool to endorse some new rights under Article 3, like the right to needle exchange programmes for prisoners who inject drugs. On the other hand, the Court is overwhelmed with cases, the number of applications has been growing constantly during last years and it does not seem very likely that this problem will be solved in the near future. The ECtHR needs an urgent reform to deal with the continuing increase in the number of applications. This was the main reason for drafting Protocol No. 14 which has been ratified by all Council of Europe member states but Russia. Russia constitutes the main holdback for reforming the Convention system and consequently strengthening the protection of prisoners. Protocol No. 14 is currently the only available solution to the Council of Europe in order to reduce the number of applications pending before ECtHR. The prosperity of the ECtHR and its role as the most effective human rights court are seriously jeopardised.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- HeinOnline
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- LISA: Library and Information Science Abstracts
- Sociological Abstracts
- Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
- Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals
- L' Indice Penale
- CRIM kriminologija in kazensko pravosodje