Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 540705

Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia


Protić, Alen; Horvat, Mladen; Komen-Ušljebrka, Helga; Frković, Vedran; Žuvić-Butorac, Marta; Bukal, Krešimir; Šustić, Alan
Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia // Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122 (2010), 19/20; 584-587 doi:10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9 (recenziran, članak, stručni)


CROSBI ID: 540705 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia

Autori
Protić, Alen ; Horvat, Mladen ; Komen-Ušljebrka, Helga ; Frković, Vedran ; Žuvić-Butorac, Marta ; Bukal, Krešimir ; Šustić, Alan

Izvornik
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (0043-5325) 122 (2010), 19/20; 584-587

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, stručni

Ključne riječi
ultrasound; femoro-popliteal block; anckle surgery; spinal anesthesia

Sažetak
Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has gained popularity for ankle and foot surgery. The aim of our study was to investigate the sufficiency of anesthesia for ankle surgery as well as duration of analgesia in postoperative period, using minimal invasive ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, and to compare it with anesthesia and postoperative analgesia following spinal anesthesia. This prospective study included 40 adult trauma patients with bimalleolar fracture who were scheduled for surgery. They were randomly assigned and divided in two groups. Patients from the first group underwent an Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block (US-FPB), while a spinal anesthesia (SA) was performed for the second group. The local anesthetic 0.5% bupivacaine was used in both groups. Eighteen patients from the first and nineteen patients from the second group completed the study. Levels of anesthesia were sufficient in both groups without significant differences. Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in US-FPB group in comparison to SA group (12 ± 3 vs. 3 ± 1 h) (p < 0.001). At the same time, onset of complete sensory motor block was significantly faster in SA group in comparison to US-FPB group (5 ± 1 vs. 8 ± 3 min) (p < 0.001). Minimal invasive US-FPB provides sufficient anesthesia for ankle fracture. In comparison to the SA group, patients from the US-FPB group achieved significantly longer postoperative analgesia, while faster onset of anesthesia was noted in SA group.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
062-0000000-0220 - Perkutana traheostomija u prevenciji pneumonije u strojno ventiliranih bolesnika (Šustić, Alan, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka,
Klinički bolnički centar Rijeka

Profili:

Avatar Url Marta Žuvić (autor)

Avatar Url Krešimir Bukal (autor)

Avatar Url Mladen Horvat (autor)

Avatar Url Alan Šustić (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi link.springer.com

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Protić, Alen; Horvat, Mladen; Komen-Ušljebrka, Helga; Frković, Vedran; Žuvić-Butorac, Marta; Bukal, Krešimir; Šustić, Alan
Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia // Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122 (2010), 19/20; 584-587 doi:10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9 (recenziran, članak, stručni)
Protić, A., Horvat, M., Komen-Ušljebrka, H., Frković, V., Žuvić-Butorac, M., Bukal, K. & Šustić, A. (2010) Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 122 (19/20), 584-587 doi:10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9.
@article{article, author = {Proti\'{c}, Alen and Horvat, Mladen and Komen-U\v{s}ljebrka, Helga and Frkovi\'{c}, Vedran and \v{Z}uvi\'{c}-Butorac, Marta and Bukal, Kre\v{s}imir and \v{S}usti\'{c}, Alan}, year = {2010}, pages = {584-587}, DOI = {10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9}, keywords = {ultrasound, femoro-popliteal block, anckle surgery, spinal anesthesia}, journal = {Wiener klinische Wochenschrift}, doi = {10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9}, volume = {122}, number = {19/20}, issn = {0043-5325}, title = {Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia}, keyword = {ultrasound, femoro-popliteal block, anckle surgery, spinal anesthesia} }
@article{article, author = {Proti\'{c}, Alen and Horvat, Mladen and Komen-U\v{s}ljebrka, Helga and Frkovi\'{c}, Vedran and \v{Z}uvi\'{c}-Butorac, Marta and Bukal, Kre\v{s}imir and \v{S}usti\'{c}, Alan}, year = {2010}, pages = {584-587}, DOI = {10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9}, keywords = {ultrasound, femoro-popliteal block, anckle surgery, spinal anesthesia}, journal = {Wiener klinische Wochenschrift}, doi = {10.1007/s00508-010-1451-9}, volume = {122}, number = {19/20}, issn = {0043-5325}, title = {Benefit of the minimal invasive ultrasound-guided single shot femoro-popliteal block for ankle surgery in comparison with spinal anesthesia}, keyword = {ultrasound, femoro-popliteal block, anckle surgery, spinal anesthesia} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus
  • MEDLINE


Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • MEDLINE


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font