Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 539513

About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science


Pečarić, Đilda; Tuđman, Miroslav
About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science // Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries / Katsirikou, Anthi (ur.).
Atena, 2011. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 539513 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science

Autori
Pečarić, Đilda ; Tuđman, Miroslav

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries / Katsirikou, Anthi - Atena, 2011

Skup
3rd Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries International Conference

Mjesto i datum
Atena, Grčka, 24.05.2011. - 27.05.2011

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
Social Networks; Institutional Networks; Communicational Networks And Cognitive Networks; Cohesion; Coherence; Bibliometric Analysis; Scientific Development

Sažetak
In this paper we advocate thesis that cohesion and coherence of scientific field should be conceptual framework, i.e. criterion for the research of scientific development. With such an approach we can research scientific development realized through social networks, institutional networks, communicational networks and cognitive networks. All these forms of scientific collaboration, i.e. all these networks can influence the structure and dynamics of the development of (information) sciences. In that context, bibliometric data used as indicators of cohesion and coherence of information science are not only quantitative indicators, but could also be used as quantitative data of qualitative indicators that we could define by new conceptual framework. We believe that it is possible to advocate following hypothesis: a) two scientific communities can use (generate) two different communication networks (that can be identified by co-citation analysis, that is, clusters of most cited authors) ; b) two scientific communities can generate same or similar cognitive networks (that can be identified by co-word analysis). These postulate the difference between communication and cognitive networks. That means that “knowledge maps” and “intellectual structure” as the product of bibliometric analysis from 1980s on are not precise enough today.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
130-1301799-1999 - Oblikovanje i upravljanje javnim znanjem u informacijskom prostoru (Tuđman, Miroslav, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Đilda Pečarić (autor)

Avatar Url Miroslav Tuđman (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Pečarić, Đilda; Tuđman, Miroslav
About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science // Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries / Katsirikou, Anthi (ur.).
Atena, 2011. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
Pečarić, Đ. & Tuđman, M. (2011) About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science. U: Katsirikou, A. (ur.)Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries.
@article{article, author = {Pe\v{c}ari\'{c}, \DJilda and Tu\djman, Miroslav}, editor = {Katsirikou, A.}, year = {2011}, keywords = {Social Networks, Institutional Networks, Communicational Networks And Cognitive Networks, Cohesion, Coherence, Bibliometric Analysis, Scientific Development}, title = {About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science}, keyword = {Social Networks, Institutional Networks, Communicational Networks And Cognitive Networks, Cohesion, Coherence, Bibliometric Analysis, Scientific Development}, publisherplace = {Atena, Gr\v{c}ka} }
@article{article, author = {Pe\v{c}ari\'{c}, \DJilda and Tu\djman, Miroslav}, editor = {Katsirikou, A.}, year = {2011}, keywords = {Social Networks, Institutional Networks, Communicational Networks And Cognitive Networks, Cohesion, Coherence, Bibliometric Analysis, Scientific Development}, title = {About the differences between communication networks and cognitive networks. Contribution to Research of Bibliometric methods in Information Science}, keyword = {Social Networks, Institutional Networks, Communicational Networks And Cognitive Networks, Cohesion, Coherence, Bibliometric Analysis, Scientific Development}, publisherplace = {Atena, Gr\v{c}ka} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font