Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 538012
Dose intensity of chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Dose intensity of chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma // Journal of clinical oncology, 28 (2010), 34; 5074-5080 doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5771 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 538012 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Dose intensity of chemotherapy in patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Autori
Josting, Andreas ; Mueller, Horst ; Borchmann, Peter ; Baars, Joke, W ; Metzner, Bart ; Doehner, Hartmut ; Aurer, Igor ; Smardova, Lenka ; Fischer, Thomas ; Niederwieser, Dietger ; Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin ; Schmitz, Norbert ; Sureda, Anna ; Glossmann, Jan ; Diehl, Volker ; De Jong, Daphne ; Hansmann, Martin-Leo ; Raemaekers, John ; Engert, Andreas
Izvornik
Journal of clinical oncology (0732-183X) 28
(2010), 34;
5074-5080
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Hodgkin lymphoma; autologous stem cell transplantation; chemotherapy
Sažetak
Purpose High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) has become the standard treatment for patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). The intensity of treatment needed is unclear. This European intergroup study evaluated the impact of sequential high-dose chemotherapy (SHDCT) before myeloablative therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically confirmed, relapsed HL were treated with two cycles of dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin, and those without disease progression were randomly assigned. In the standard arm (A), patients received myeloablative therapy with carmustine, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) followed by PBSCT. Patients in the experimental arm (B) also received sequential cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and etoposide in high-doses before BEAM. Freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) was the primary end point. Remission rates, overall survival (OS), and toxicity of treatment were secondary end points. Results From a total of 284 patients included, 241 responding patients were randomly assigned after two cycles of dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatinum. Patients treated in arm B had longer treatment duration and experienced more toxicity and protocol violations (P .05). Mortality was similar in both arms (20% and 18%). With a median observation time of 42 months, there was no significant difference in terms of FFTF (P .56) and OS (P .82) between arms. FFTF at 3 years was 62% (95% CI, 56% to 68%) and OS was 80% (95% CI, 75% to 85%). Patients with stage IV, early relapse, multiple relapse, anemia, or B symptoms had a higher risk of recurrence (P .001). Conclusion Compared with conventional high-dose chemotherapy, additional SHDCT is associated with more adverse effects and does not improve the prognosis of patients with relapsed HL.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
108-1081872-1908 - Dijagnostika i liječenje limfoma (Aurer, Igor, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb
Profili:
Igor Aurer
(autor)
Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:
Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi jco.ascopubs.org jco.ascopubs.orgCitiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE