Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 522818
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction // Law, Science, Technology, 25th IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Abstract Book / Neumann, Ulfrid (ur.).
Frankfurt: Internationale Vereinigung fuer Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 2011. str. 419-419 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 522818 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Reply to Criticisms of the (Means of) Execution Thesis as a Kind of Legal Sanction
Autori
Burazin, Luka
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Law, Science, Technology, 25th IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Abstract Book
/ Neumann, Ulfrid - Frankfurt : Internationale Vereinigung fuer Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 2011, 419-419
Skup
Law, Science, Technology, 25th IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
Mjesto i datum
Frankfurt na Majni, Njemačka, 15.08.2011. - 20.08.2011
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
sanction; execution; means of execution; damage reparation; individualisation of sanction
Sažetak
The paper first outlines the thesis on (the means of) execution as a kind of legal sanction (esp. in the case of causing damage). It then sets out the basic theoretical arguments for rejecting the viewpoint according to which the duty of repair represents a sanction in the case of causing damage. The paper goes on to present the viewpoints of several legal philosophers (Bucher, MacCormick, Padjen, Pokrovac) who raised objections to the thesis on (the means of) execution. Finally, it critically analyses these objections and sets out six additional arguments with a view to strenghtening the said thesis.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
