Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 520220
Cochrane systematic review as a PhD thesis: an alternative with numerous advantages
Cochrane systematic review as a PhD thesis: an alternative with numerous advantages // Biochemia medica : časopis hrvatskoga društva medicinskih biokemičara, 20 (2010), 3; 319-326 (recenziran, pregledni rad, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 520220 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Cochrane systematic review as a PhD thesis: an alternative with numerous advantages
Autori
Sambunjak, Dario ; Puljak, Livia
Izvornik
Biochemia medica : časopis hrvatskoga društva medicinskih biokemičara (1330-0962) 20
(2010), 3;
319-326
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, stručni
Ključne riječi
The Cochrane Collaboration; PhD thesis; Systematic Reviews
Sažetak
In this article we propose that the production of a systematic review within The Cochrane Collaboration should be considered a valid mode of achieving doctoral title in medicine and related professions, including biochemistry. While engaging in a Cochrane systematic review, an author first registers a title, then writes a peer-reviewed protocol consisting of introduction and methods, and finally publishes a full systematic review in The Cochrane Library, a monthly publication, which in 2009 reached an impact factor of 5.65. Conducting a Cochrane systematic review can give PhD candidates not only an opportunity to acquire a high level of content and methodological expertise, but also the capacity to learn and solve problems by using critical and analytical thinking. This capacity is considered one of the key generic and transferable skills necessary for future researchers. While working on a Cochrane systematic review, an author builds international research network. Cochrane Review Groups as editorial bases of The Cochrane Collaboration offer ongoing support and advice to the authors. Besides being clinically relevant and high-impact, Cochrane systematic reviews should be especially interesting to doctoral students from low- and middle-income countries because they are associated with relatively small financial burden. In conclusion, systematic reviews have a number of advantages and therefore institutions offering postgraduate training should consider adopting a “Cochrane PhD”, and students should consider doing a Cohrane systematic review for their doctoral thesis.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
216-1080314-0245 - Utjecaj znanstvenog časopisa na hrvatsku medicinsku zajednicu (Marušić, Matko, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:
Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- CA Search (Chemical Abstracts)