Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 51123
Morphological differences in some Cobitis populations from Croatia. Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera.
Morphological differences in some Cobitis populations from Croatia. Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera. // Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera / Penaz, Milan et al. (ur.).
Brno: Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Brno, 1999. (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 51123 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Morphological differences in some Cobitis populations from Croatia. Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera.
Autori
Schneider, Daniela ; Mrakovčić, Milorad ; Mustafić, Perica ; Kerovec, Mladen
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera
/ Penaz, Milan et al. - Brno : Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Brno, 1999
Skup
International Conference "Loaches of the Genus Cobitis and Related Genera"
Mjesto i datum
Brno, Češka Republika, 31.05.1999. - 03.06.1999
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
-
Sažetak
Most of the Cobitis species from the area of south Europe are briefly described by Karaman,
1929, without morphometric data, figures and descriptions of some specific morphological
characters.Also, long-term genetic and other investigations showed that the so-called ~common loach", until recently considered as polytypic Cobitis taenia species, is in fact the complex of many reproductively isolated species, a large number of them with restricted range of distribution. Based on these facts it was necessary to redescribe the population from this area. The analyzed populations were taken from the Adriatic river basin(rivers Zrmanja, Cetina and Neretva) together with one population from the Danube river basin (river Drava). The methods
of analysis comprised classical truss network morphometry, meristic parameters and also some
mophological characters. The values of the truss network morphometry showed bimodal
distribution for populations from Cetina and Zrmanja, which point to the possible existence of
the two subpopulations in these rivers. For the Cetina loaches this is supported with two types
of lamina circularis and suborbital spines in both sexes. Meristic characters like the number of vetebrae showed a similarity between populations of the Cetina and Neretva and populations from the Zrmanja and Drava. Maximal number of eggs showed similarity between populations from the Cetina and Drava (3300 eggs) but not in the size of eggs. In the latter,
a character similarity exists between the Neretva and Drava loaches. T-test for the truss
network values showed little differences between populations from the Cetina and Neretva, but
the population from the Zrmanja is highly different from other populations. Sexes observed
separately by this method showed that males from the river Drava are different from males
from the Cetina and Neretva in almost all values, while females showed. The methods
of analysis comprised classical truss network morphometry, meristic parameters and also some
mophological characters. The values of the truss network morphometry showed bimodal
distribution for populations from Cetina and Zrmanja, which point to the possible existence of
the two subpopulations in these rivers. For the Cetina loaches this is supported with two types
of lamina circularis and suborbital spines in both sexes. Meristic characters like the number of vetebrae showed a similarity between populations of the Cetina and Neretva and populations from the Zrmanja and Drava. Maximal number of eggs showed similarity between populations from the Cetina and Drava (3300 eggs) but not in the size of eggs. In the latter,
a character similarity exists between the Neretva and Drava loaches. T-test for the truss
network values showed little differences between populations from the Cetina and Neretva, but
the population from the Zrmanja is highly different from other populations. Sexes observed
separately by this method showed that males from the river Drava are different from males
from the Cetina and Neretva in almost all values, while females showed The methods
of analysis comprised classical truss network morphometry, meristic parameters and also some
mophological characters. The values of the truss network morphometry showed bimodal
distribution for populations from Cetina and Zrmanja, which point to the possible existence of
the two subpopulations in these rivers. For the Cetina loaches this is supported with two types
of lamina circularis and suborbital spines in both sexes. Meristic characters like the number of vetebrae showed a similarity between populations of the Cetina and Neretva and populations from the Zrmanja and Drava. Maximal number of eggs showed similarity between populations from the Cetina and Drava (3300 eggs) but not in the size of eggs. In the latter,
a character similarity exists between the Neretva and Drava loaches. T-test for the truss
network values showed little differences between populations from the Cetina and Neretva, but
the population from the Zrmanja is highly different from other populations. Sexes observed
separately by this method showed that males from the river Drava are different from males
from the Cetina and Neretva in almost all values, while females showed. These results suggest the possible hybridization between the
populations from the Danube and Adriatic river basins. Clusters made for the classical morphometry showed a similarity among Adriatic populations. Clusters for the truss
network morphometry showed results obtained by t-test. Phenotypic characters showed that
all four populations are different
and recognizable from the each other. Adriatic populations have an awry position of upper
caudal fin base spots, and they are brown to dark brown while the Drava population has a jet
black spot. Populations of Zrmanja and Neretva have two of them, but in the Neretva
population the lower one is less visible. The shape of mouth and barbels showed that in the
loaches form Cetina and Zrmanja barbels are very long, but in the Zrmanja population they are
also thin and pigmented. Comparison with the Sweden holotype material described by Nalbant,
1993, showed that the populations from Croatia are different. Two spots at the base of caudal
fin in Zrmanja population point to similarity with the Italian C. t. bilineata Canestrini, 1865 from river Po basin, and loaches from the Drava are similar to C. t. danubialis Bacescu, 1993 from Romania. Also loaches from Cetina and Neretva, until now considered as a subspecies of the Cobitis taenia, should be raised on the species level. Future genetic investigations are
necessary to support this theory.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Biologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Daniela Schneider
(autor)
Milorad Mrakovčić
(autor)
Mladen Kerovec
(autor)
Perica Mustafić
(autor)