Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 486392

Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness


Petković, Tomislav; Kostanjčar, Zvonko; Sović, Ana
Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness // International journal of intelligent defence support systems, 3 (2010), 1/2; 101-115 doi:10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 486392 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness

Autori
Petković, Tomislav ; Kostanjčar, Zvonko ; Sović, Ana

Izvornik
International journal of intelligent defence support systems (1755-1587) 3 (2010), 1/2; 101-115

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
e-learning; MCQ test; student assessment; multiple choice tests; multiple-choice questions; knowledge assessment; electronic learning; online learning; written tests; online tests; higher education; university students

Sažetak
With the online resources becoming common, one can ask what the limitations are when applied to online examinations. Standardised multiple-choice questions (MCQs) test are commonly used either as a tool to enable student self-examination or as a tool to test large number of students in a more efficient way. However, the means of delivery and what one intends the tests to measure should be carefully considered. During last two years in teaching, the course ‘Signals and Systems’, both online and written, proctored and non-proctored, MCQs test were used in production environment (in vivo). Obtained data suggest that test delivery method strongly influences test accuracy when measuring the knowledge students gained. Online non-proctored delivery, although being the simplest, yields strongly biased results and is suitable only as a tool to enable student self-assessment of the gained knowledge, while the online or written (non-strictly) proctored tests are still the method of choice if one wants to objectively measure the knowledge gained by students.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Elektrotehnika, Pedagogija



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
036-0362214-1987 - Modeliranje kompleksnih sustava (Jeren, Branko, MZO ) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Fakultet elektrotehnike i računarstva, Zagreb

Profili:

Avatar Url Zvonko Kostanjčar (autor)

Avatar Url Ana Sović (autor)

Avatar Url Tomislav Petković (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Petković, Tomislav; Kostanjčar, Zvonko; Sović, Ana
Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness // International journal of intelligent defence support systems, 3 (2010), 1/2; 101-115 doi:10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680 (podatak o recenziji nije dostupan, članak, znanstveni)
Petković, T., Kostanjčar, Z. & Sović, A. (2010) Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness. International journal of intelligent defence support systems, 3 (1/2), 101-115 doi:10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680.
@article{article, author = {Petkovi\'{c}, Tomislav and Kostanj\v{c}ar, Zvonko and Sovi\'{c}, Ana}, year = {2010}, pages = {101-115}, DOI = {10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680}, keywords = {e-learning, MCQ test, student assessment, multiple choice tests, multiple-choice questions, knowledge assessment, electronic learning, online learning, written tests, online tests, higher education, university students}, journal = {International journal of intelligent defence support systems}, doi = {10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680}, volume = {3}, number = {1/2}, issn = {1755-1587}, title = {Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness}, keyword = {e-learning, MCQ test, student assessment, multiple choice tests, multiple-choice questions, knowledge assessment, electronic learning, online learning, written tests, online tests, higher education, university students} }
@article{article, author = {Petkovi\'{c}, Tomislav and Kostanj\v{c}ar, Zvonko and Sovi\'{c}, Ana}, year = {2010}, pages = {101-115}, DOI = {10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680}, keywords = {e-learning, MCQ test, student assessment, multiple choice tests, multiple-choice questions, knowledge assessment, electronic learning, online learning, written tests, online tests, higher education, university students}, journal = {International journal of intelligent defence support systems}, doi = {10.1504/IJIDSS.2010.033680}, volume = {3}, number = {1/2}, issn = {1755-1587}, title = {Online vs. written multiple-choice questions tests: accuracy and usefulness}, keyword = {e-learning, MCQ test, student assessment, multiple choice tests, multiple-choice questions, knowledge assessment, electronic learning, online learning, written tests, online tests, higher education, university students} }

Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::


  • INSPEC


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font