Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 46007
Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives
Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives // Journal of Dental Research / Herzberg, Mark C. (ur.).
Alexandria (VA): IADR: International and American Association for Dental Research, 2000. str. 534-534 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 46007 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Microleakage evaluation of composite restoratives
Autori
Simeon, Paris ; Pevalek, Jasmika ; Jukić, Silvana ; Prskalo, Katica ; Šutalo, Jozo ; Anić, Ivica
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, stručni
Izvornik
Journal of Dental Research
/ Herzberg, Mark C. - Alexandria (VA) : IADR: International and American Association for Dental Research, 2000, 534-534
Skup
78th General Session od IADR
Mjesto i datum
Sjedinjene Američke Države, 05.04.2000. - 08.04.2000
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
microleakage; evaluation; restoratives
Sažetak
Almost total understanding of microleakage was obtained using the method of extracting the filling out of the cavity and observing the pattern of dye leakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate three restorative systems by observing microleakage using this method. Fortyeight intact premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons have received buccal cervical cavities of uniform dimensions. Teeth were divided in four groups of twelve and restored (Group 1 - T.P.H. + Prime&Bond 2.0. ; Group 2 - Heliomolar + Syntac S.C. ; Group 3 - Tetric + Syntac S.C. ; control group 4 - Fuji II LC). Teeth were thermocycled, protected with wax, immersed in acid resistant ink (Rotring Ink) for 24 hours, then immersed in 5% nitric acid (3 days) until softened enough to pull the fillings out of their cavities. Leakage pattern was observed on extracted fillings and maximal depth of leakage (scores or levels from 0 to 4) was measured through a dissecting microscope. Results show that leakage occurred at levels 1 and 2 in Group 1 in 10/12 specimen (83.3%), in Group 2 in 4/12 (33.3%), in Group 3 in 2/12 specimen (16.6%) and in Group 4 in 8/12 (58.3%). Differences between Groups 1 and 4 were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Differences between Groups 2 and Groups 3 and 4 were not statistically significant (P<0.05). Differences between Groups 3 and 4 were statistically significant (P<0.05). Although differences between some groups were significant to evaluate certain material further investigation should be performed using this method of investigation.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb