Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 433724
Antinomy Between the General Principles of Law (City Cemetery Case)
Antinomy Between the General Principles of Law (City Cemetery Case) // Dignitas - slovenska revija za človekove pravice / Peter Jambrek (ur.).
Kranj: The Graduate School of Government and European Studies and European Faculty of Law at Nova Gorica, 2010. str. 275-290 (plenarno, nije recenziran, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 433724 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Antinomy Between the General Principles of Law (City Cemetery Case)
Autori
Burazin, Luka
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Dignitas - slovenska revija za človekove pravice
/ Peter Jambrek - Kranj : The Graduate School of Government and European Studies and European Faculty of Law at Nova Gorica, 2010, 275-290
Skup
Legal Argumentation and the Challenges of Modern Europe
Mjesto i datum
Nova Gorica, Slovenija, 15.10.2009. - 16.10.2009
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Plenarno
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
general principles of law; antinomy; gaps in the law; legal argumentation; legal theory
Sažetak
After having briefly presented the relevant facts, the author of the paper highlights two major theoretical dilemmas arising from a recent case (the so-called City Cemetery case) that was settled before the Croatian courts: the problem of gaps in the law and the problem of antinomy between two principles of law (the principle of nemo plus iuris and the principle of good faith). In an attempt to resolve the aforementioned dilemmas the author first presents the general stance on the problems of gaps in the law and antinomy in the law and the ways of dealing with them within the framework of the general theory of law. Furthermore, the author analyses the contents of the principles in question. Finally, on the basis of the solutions given in the writings on the general theory of law and the results of the analysis of the said principles, the author criticises the reasoning of the final judgment in the City Cemetery case and provides a different (theoretical) approach to the solving of these dilemmas.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo