ࡱ> q` bjbjqPqP .::M% 4șșș8DD4%,*"LLL.͞ $h$:֦֦֦LL;\&&&֦LL&֦&&JLx PF ș9 HH,^j^^LٞX&'֦֦֦֦ٞٞٞٞٞٞ%%%;`8%%%`  Measurement and parameterization of proton elastic scattering cross-sections for nitrogen I. Bogdanovi Radovi*, Z. Siketi and M. Jakai Ruer Boakovi Institute, P.O. Box 180, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia A.F. Gurbich Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Bondarenko sq. 1, 249033 Obninsk, Russian Federation The cross-sections for the elastic scattering of protons from natural nitrogen at non-Rutherford scattering energies were measured at three laboratory scattering angles: 118, 150 and 165. The experimental data were parameterized in the framework of nuclear physics models. A benchmark experiment was performed in order to prove that the excitation functions obtained in the present work can be used to adequately simulate the yield from a thick target containing nitrogen. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: iva@irb.hr I. INTRODUCTION For materials analysis, Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy is an established analytical technique. It can provide information about thickness, elemental composition or stochiometry of the analyzed material. For light element detection, analytical use of protons instead of alpha particles is more and more common due to a larger probing depth and enhanced scattering cross-sections coming from the nuclear component of the interaction above the Coulomb barrier. The presence of this non-Rutherford component in the scattering cross-section implies the need of detailed measurements of excitation functions at different scattering angles. A significant amount of work has been done in the last few decades in order to achieve a reliable database for the scattering of both protons and alpha particles from light elements. This work is summarized in the IBANDL database.1 The database contains most of the available experimental nuclear cross-sections relevant to Ion Beam Analysis. For some projectile-nucleus scattering systems evaluated cross sections are also available.2 The evaluation consists in the elaboration of the most accurate available cross-sections through the incorporation of the all relevant experimental data in the framework of nuclear physics theory.3 The advantage of evaluated cross-sections is that excitation functions for analytical purposes can be calculated for any scattering angle or energy, with a reliability exceeding that of any individual measurement. Nitrogen is often present as a main constituent in bulk targets or as an important constituent in thin films. Analysis with protons of samples containing nitrogen is typically done at energies above the Coulomb barrier where the cross-section is no longer Rutherford. Therefore, for a quantitative analysis and depth profiling of nitrogen it is important to know the exact cross-sections. The motivation for the present work was to supply new data for the 14N(p,p)14N cross-sections, especially at energies above 3 MeV. Up to now, scattering of protons from nitrogen has been reported in numerous publications for angles important for backscattering analysis (>120) mainly at energies not exceeding 3 MeV.4-14 In works published almost half a century ago, authors have used gaseous N target and CsI(Tl) crystal detectors to study states in compound nucleus 15O. 4-9 In more recent works measurements have been done with nitrogen-containing thin films deposited on the carbon substrate, similar to that used in the present work. 10-14 For detection, silicon surface barrier detectors were applied at scattering angles important for the backscattering analysis. Previously acquired data were used to produce the evaluated cross-sections in the energy range up to 3.4 MeV.15 The motivation for the present work was lack of the reliable cross-section data for the elastic scattering of protons from nitrogen up to 5 MeV. II. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS The apparatus Measurements were performed using proton beams from the 6.0 MV Tandem Van de Graaff accelerator at the Ruer Boakovi Institute in Zagreb. The beam was extracted from a sputtering ion source using a TiH2 cathode. The energy calibration of the accelerator was done using narrow resonance in 27Al(p,)28Si at 991.88 keV and neutron threshold reaction 7Li(p,n)7Be at 1880.6 keV. Final energy spread of the beam was calculated to be 0.1% of the incident beam energy. The proton beam, delimited by horizontal and vertical slits to a spot of 22 mm2 impinged on the sample at normal incidence. To detect backscattered protons from the target, three surface barrier detectors with a 2.5 msr solid angle each were positioned at 118, 150 and 165. The energy resolution of the detectors used was 12 keV for protons in the measured energy range. The excitation function of the 14N(p,p)14N was measured between 2.4 and 5.0 MeV with minimum step of 10 keV where the cross-section varied rapidly and 25 keV elsewhere. B. Samples It is quite difficult to select solid target appropriate for the N cross section measurements. As we wanted to have a N signal well separated from signals coming from other elements, a thin AlN film deposited by reactive sputtering on a vitreous graphite substrate was used. On the top, a 6 nm Au layer was evaporated for normalization purposes, assuming that cross-sections for backscattering of protons from Au are Rutherford in the entire energy range studied in this work. In addition, the normalization to gold eliminates further corrections due to the dead time, knowledge of absolute solid angle value and errors due to imperfect charge collection. Target stability was examined regularly by measuring N and Au intensity ratios at 3 MeV. It was found that this ratio was within 2.7% during the measurements. III. DATA ANALYSIS The average differential cross-section for backscattering of protons from N at scattering angle ( is given by:  EMBED Equation.DSMT4 , (1) where E is incident proton energy, DEAu is energy loss in Au layer, DEAlN is energy loss in AlN film, AN is area under the N peak, Q the number of incident H ions, ((() the detector solid angle and NN the number of nitrogen atoms per unit area (at/cm2), and where the detected counts are actually given by an integral of the differential cross-section over the energy thickness of the film. Very sharp resonances cannot be resolved by this method. The differential cross section for backscattering of protons from Au for an angle  is given by the following equation:  EMBED Equation.DSMT4 , (2) where AAu is area under the Au peak, and NAu the number of Au atoms per unit area. Normalization against Au signal leads to:  EMBED Equation.DSMT4  (3) To calculate the cross sections using Eq. (3) it is necessary to know the NAu/NN ratio. Therefore, the thin film was carefully investigated by 2 MeV 4He backscattering since for this beam all the cross-sections are pure Rutherford to determine the stochiometry, layer thickness, homogeneity and presence of impurities that could affect the results. It was found that NN=(63930)x1015 at/cm2 and NAu=(38.60.6)x1015 at/cm2 which gives NAu/NN ratio equal to 0.06040.0030. The energy loss of protons in the Au and AlN layers was calculated using stopping power data incorporated in the program SRIM 2003.16 The energy loss of protons in the Au layer varied between 0.5 and 0.3 keV and in the AlN layer between 5.5 and 3.2 keV for the minimum and maximum projectile energy, respectively. Because of its small value, the correction  EMBED Equation.DSMT4  in Eq. (3) can be neglected. IV. PARAMETERIZATION The experimental data obtained were parameterized in the framework of the R-matrix theory with optical model phases being used instead of hard spheres ones. The initial values for the resonance parameters were taken from the paper by M.L.West et al.9 Because the substitution of optical model phases for hard sphere ones influenced the interference between potential and resonance scattering, the shape of the resonances changed and so some of the resonances were assigned spins and parities different from those assumed by West et al. The final list of the resonance parameters is presented in Table 1. The natural boundary conditions were set at the resonance energies listed in Table 2. The parameters of spin and orbital momentum mixing are presented in Table 1 following Nelson et al. definitions.19 The channel spin mixing ratio is defined as  EMBED Equation.3 , (4) where s> is the higher channel spin and ( is the total width of the decay channel. The l-mixing ratio is defined as  EMBED Equation.3  (5) with corresponding mixing angles (s = atan ((s) introduced for convenience. The range of ( is from 0 to 1, and the range of ( is from -90( to +90(. With two s values and two l values contributing there are a maximum of four elastic scattering partial widths (s,l . These widths may be expressed in terms of three mixing ratios (, (<, (> and the total elastic scattering width ( by the following relations:  EMBED Equation.3  (6) The potential parameters were found by fitting the non-resonance background in the excitation functions. In order to accurately reproduce shape resonances the real potential well was split on the l-number. The final set of the optical parameters is presented in Table 3 (in usual optical model notation). The real potential has energy dependence V=V0-bE, where V0 values are listed in the Table 3 and b=2.865. The imaginary potential at energies less than 4 MeV was assumed to be zero. Fig.1 demonstrates behavior of the theoretical cross-section on scattering angle and energy. V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Experimentally determined proton backscattering cross-sections from N together with theoretical calculations and all other available experimental data are plotted for laboratory angles of 118, 150 and 165 in Fig. 2. In the entire investigated energy region the cross-sections are significantly higher then Rutherford. The energies to which the reported cross sections are assigned correspond to incident proton energies minus half the energy loss in the AlN layer. The uncertainty in the measured cross-sections is calculated to be less then 6% for energies below 4.6 MeV and between 6% and 8% for energies from 4.6 and 5 MeV for 165 and 150. For 118 the relative uncertainty was below 5% for all energies. The following factors were taken into consideration for estimating the uncertainty: the counting statistics of the peak areas and the systematic error in determining the NAu/NN ratio. Uncertainties due to dead time, solid angle and improper charge measurement are eliminated with the normalization to backscattering protons from gold. Errors of the detector angular settings were estimated to be negligible. Numerical values of the cross sections together with the corresponding uncertainties are available on request from the authors. They will be also uploaded to the IBANDL database.1 The agreement between calculated and measured cross sections is very good for larger scattering angles (165 and 150) in the entire energy region where calculations were performed. Calculations predict only one strong and narrow resonance at 3196 keV with FWHM of 12 keV. The experimental points are shifted about 5 keV compared to theoretical predictions toward the lower energies. For 118 and below 3.3 MeV theoretical calculations predict for about 15% higher cross sections. Except narrow resonance at 3196 keV another strong but significantly broader resonance is measured at 3870 keV with cross sections value 85 times larger then Rutherford. From Fig. 2 is visible that excitation functions are characterized with broad regions where cross section is almost constant and considerably larger than Rutherford. Those plateaus with enhanced cross sections can be used for analysis of smaller amounts of nitrogen in heavier matrices for backscattering analysis. For comparison with our results, other available experimental data are shown at the same figure. For the investigated energy region, our measurements can be compared with data from several references4-8,14. Cross sections at 118 are compared with data from Ref. 4 for 121.1. In the region from 2.4 up to 3.25 MeV present data are for about 10% lower than data from Ref. 4. Above 3.25 MeV agreement is better. Data from West et al.9 are given for 124 and are for around 10% higher than present data. Around 150 there are three data sets that can be compared with our results. Those from Ref. 7 for 153,4 are slightly higher, but data from Ref. 8 for 155.2 are in fair agreement with the present ones. Recently measured data from Jiang et al.14 are for about 30% lower then other measurements in the region between 2.5 and 3.2 MeV. Results for 165 can be compared with data for 159.5 from Bashkin et al.5, 167.2 from Olness et al.6 and 165 from Lambert and Durand8. Again, in the energy range from 2.6 to 3.5 MeV, our data are up to 10% lower than those data but above 3.5 MeV agreement is satisfactory. In order to examine if N excitation function measured in the present work and incorporated into simulation program SIMNRA (Ref. 17) can interpret properly the experimentally obtained N thick target yield we have performed benchmark experiment. For that, thick BN target was selected. Target was covered with 8 nm Au layer for the normalization purposes. In order to separate 14N(p,p)14N spectrum from the background coming from 10B(p,a) 10B, 11B(p,a) 11B as well as possible pile-up contribution, DE-E telescope was used. 15.9 mm thick DE Si detector was placed 15 mm in front of thick energy Si particle detector (300 mm). Telescope solid angle was 1.4 msr. DE detector was thick enough to stop completely low energy alphas coming from 10B(p,a0)10B (Q = 1447 keV) and 10B(p,a1)10B (Q=717 keV) reactions. For more energetic alphas coming from 11B(p,a0)11B reaction (Q = 8591 keV), energy loss in DE detector was significantly larger than energy loss for protons and signals can be well separated. Fig. 3(a) shows two dimensional maps of E-DE coincident events. Small contribution coming from pile-up can be also seen. Projection of all events to the x (energy) axis is done on Fig. 3(b), events belonging only to (p,p) scattering are shown on Fig. 3(c) and those coming from (p,a) on Fig. 3(d). Simulations of backscattering spectra of BN target at 150 and two energies 3.24 and 4.50 MeV are shown on Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). In the simulation program (Ref. 17), the step width of incident ions was chosen that for each point in the cross section file there was at least one sub-layer in the simulation program. Stopping power data incorporated in SRIM 2003 were used.16 For simulation at 3.24 MeV, cross sections from Chiari et al. for 10B(p,p)10B and 11B(p,p)11B were applied.18 For energies higher than 3.8 MeV there are no experimental data for proton elastic scattering from boron and therefore simulation at 4.5 MeV is shown without part belonging to boron. Result of our benchmark experiment shows that difference between fit with our measured cross sections and the best fit to experimental data is in all cases less than 5%. VI. CONCLUSIONS We have measured the elastic 14N(p,p)14N scattering non-Rutherford cross sections in the energy region from 2.4 to 5 MeV for three different scattering angles, 118, 150 and 165. Experimentally obtained excitation functions are in good agreement with theoretical predictions especially for 150 and 165 in the entire energy region where calculations were preformed. The parameterization of the experimental data within physical approach provides a possibility to interpolate/extrapolate the 14N(p,p)14N cross section for any scattering angle. Calculations can be made using the on-line SigmaCalc calculator at http://www-nds.iaea.org/sigmacalc/. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are grateful to Dr. C. Jeynes for useful comments and for his help in preparing the manuscript. This work was supported by IAEA contracts #13274 and # CRO 13269/R0. A.G. acknowledges the support of Sandia National Laboratories (USA) through the ISTC project #3748p. TABLE CAPTIONS: Table 1. Resonance parameters for 14N(p,p0)14N Table 2. Energies for definition of boundary conditions (MeV). Table 3. Optimal parameters of the optical potential obtained for 14N(p,p0)14N Table 1. Resonance parameters for 14N(p,p0)14NEp, MeV(lab, keVJ(((1/2, deg(3/2, deg3.405273/20.00-3.387973/2+1.0-03.872607/2+1.0-53.9031001/2+1.0-904.205253/2+1.0-904.565103/2+0.80704.581253/21-904.631251/20.00.0-4.740103/21.0-904.780803/2+1.0-904.880805/21.0-05.046395/20.269005.2201605/2+1.0-0 Table 2. Energies for definition of boundary conditions (MeV).Jp/L,S0,1/2 0,3/21,1/21,3/2>2,1/22,3/2>3,1/23,3/24,1/24,3/2 >5,1/25,3/21/2+1.000----3.903------1/2---3.9963.996--------3/2+-3.900--3.9003.440------3/2---3.4104.580---4.580----5/2+----3.8803.880---4.575--5/2----4.580--4.5804.580----7/2+-----3.880--3.8803.880--7/2-------4.7804.780---4.7809/2+--------3.8803.880--9/2--------4.780--4.7804.780 Table 3. Optimal parameters of the optical potential obtained for 14N(p,p0)14NVR0 MeVVR1 MeVVR2 MeVVR3 MeVVR>3 MeVrR fmaR fmWD MeVrD fmaD fmVSO MeVr @   8 9 ; D E 3 L O P Q     ļĭĴę~wsoh~Ach|E h!7hh#t8 hnh;h;h7=jhILh h!7hOyh,;h6XA6 h 96 hmh%h,;h,;6h,;h| hmh6XAhvNhvNh6XA5CJaJhvNh5CJaJhvNhj5CJaJhvNhj=.5CJaJ) 9 : ;       n o  T^$d`a$gd@;7$8$gd| $da$gdk-$d`a$gdOydgd,;dgd|E   m n o r s ~  = A G I >BJQSXh1»zs hmh|E hmhm hmhhh<@bh+H hmh+H hmh hmh#Z hmhIh~Ac hmh< hmh6XAhmh6XA5 hvN5hmhvN5hmh[+5 hmh|h|CJaJh|CJaJh| h|0J*15Z\nrv12XYZnuv{|}RSƿҸ hmh h %H*h %h 9 h rH*h-hH hmh8 hmh"h"hA^h rH* hmhe hmhm hmha hmh h hmh|E hmh;STU^fgno6:?@H_a%'./7[]^ÿ÷÷ðð뢿h 9 hmh3z_ hmhs? hmh@;h<@bh<@bH*h5X hmh%hMF hmhmhHh hmh t hmhw7 hmhjl hmh hmh6XA=$%&/FIJK]m89@AIMZ[]^`ĽĹıĩҥْٖٖٖٞٚ٩َh 9hxh.hxr hmhuh,hvNhvNH*hmh%H*h7WB hmhs hmh% hmh hmhm hmh\Z3hA^hvNH* hvNH* hmhjlhsh5XhA^8 !(),0LNSbwrt.8>fj"TV\`nrhmhB;H*h+/hmhB;H* hmh1o hmhB; hmhq hmhk- hmhvNhvN hmh6XAhmh6XA5 hvN5hmh[+5 h^hj; hmhjl h5Xhjlh#t8 hvNH*h^hxrh5X2@T$hd7$8$Eƀ$ǦH$`ha$gds$hd^ha$gdqO$ & FdEƀsdž.a$gdq $da$gdk-z),-7:Z[  *STUYltv|~   -3:EN^ij˽鹱鹪幣֘ hmh hmh)LHhs hmhm hmh^qh<h<H*h< hmh1o hmhxr hmhXh= hmhk-hChCH*hxrh,hChsh+/ hmhB;9  =!>!Q!R!!!!!T%"&#&J&K&&& $da$gd^q $dha$gd^q$d`a$gd^q $da$gd[+ $da$gd05E $da$gdk-$hd7$8$H$`ha$gd<j,.=egloz{ !!!"!#!:!;!!C!»´hmh[+5 hmh6XA hmh1ohvNh/ hmh hmhhF hmh9 hmhm hmhXh05Ehs hmhh- hmh0CR hmhxr hmhk-hqVhxr hmh)LH5C!P!Q!R!V!^!p!q!!!!!!!!!""" "T"X"Z"\"d"x"""""""####^#`##丫䠙~vokvav jWhmh^qh+H hmh+Hhmh^qH*hmh^qOJQJh-OJQJhmh MH* hmh Mhmh MOJQJjhmh-EHUjDI h-CJUVaJjhmh^qU jqhmh^qh#hxr hmh^q hmh6XAhmh6XA5 h-*5&######$$T%#&$&;&<&=&>&R&T&u&w&&&&&&&& ' ')'0'4'6'8':';'<'D'O'S''''Ÿא∀yuymih7WBhmh'VbH*hxr hmh'Vbh.h.H*h.hGOh+/jhmh-EHUj]DI h-CJUVaJhmh^qH*jxhmh^qEHU#jĔCH hmh^qCJUVaJjhmh^qUh#h+Hhmh^qH* hmh^q hmh)&&&(b*c*x*y*--d../0>0?02 d`gdO $dha$gdec $da$gdOdhgd-*$d`a$gdO $da$gdk-$d`a$gd$d`a$gd^q $dha$gd^q'''''''''''[(\(](^(a(b(i(k(q(r(w(x(z({(|(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((&)1)þ۷۠ۜhA^ hmh^qh:vh: hmh3*h7WBh.h.H*h. h.h. h7WBH*hmh'VbH*hqVh`6h`6H*h`6 hmh'Vbh2hvN hmh#h# hmh+Hh+H71)5)F)G)I))))***A*B*C*D*W*`*b*c*h*w*x*y*}******++++,+0+l+q+r+s+|+̿񴬤{q{mmem`m hC H*h:vhec6hech-*B*hphhC B*hph hnh:v hnhechC h h4|5 h6XA5h h-*5h h 5 hmh6XAh05Ejh hmh^qEHU#jCH hmh^qCJUVaJjhmh^qUhA^hGOH* hmh^qhA^h:v%|+++++,,,,u,,,,,,,,-,-l-w-------------------ڷکژ~t~ihec6B*hphh-*B*hphh 9B*hphj\hecB*EHUhph jqI hecUVmHnHujhecB*UhphhGOB*H*hphhC B*hphh:vhec6B*hphhecB*hphhxIhh:vhec6h:vhechO&--..F.G.d.e.x.y.z.{.~.............//////%/&/6/7//곣ętgZZ jhecB*hph jxhecB*hph jehecB*hph jyhec6B*hphh-*B*hphh 9B*hphjhecB*EHUhph jsI hecUVmHnHujhecB*Uhphhec6B*hph jGhecB*hphhecB*hphhecB*H*hph#///////////////00002030405080:0=0?011K1L1n11Ѻѭѭџю~tjtfaf]Yfh#dhO hec6hech-*B*hphh 9B*hphjhecB*EHUhph jyI hecUVmHnHujhecB*Uhph jehecB*hph jxhecB*hphh:vB*hphhecB*hphhecB*H*hphhec6B*H*hph jGhecB*hph 1111111111$2%2)2+282@2H2T2Y2Z2e2p222222222222222222 353@3]3n3v3w3y333333P4T4c4g44毗h!B*phhoB*phhAh05Eh!hbR hmh MhxF hmh^qhmh6XA5hmh-*5hmh^q5 h+H5h 9h+9oh&%hOhh hec hecH*82222y;?LLLLLLAOBOROSOiPjPkPlPmPnPoPdgd R$d`a$gd>$d`a$gdr$d`a$gd1+m $da$gdk-44444444444444445$5&5-5/5<5R5S5g5555555556 666666666F7S7T7777777888 8(8າ瘔hohxFhX]hohAH* hmh! hmh1+mh&%h&%H*h&%hs hmhsh 9h`6 hmhD(hrh>% hmh M hmhD h! hmh]: hmhT8(8)888?8g8h8i8}8~88888888888888889&9g99999999:: :&:H:J:Y:::::::::[;`;o;x;y;;;;иШܑhZqh22h MB*phhsB*phhbRB*phh,B*phh&%B*phhoB*phhA B*phhB*phh-]Eh,hh*ah8Sh{!hX]hl8hxFho8;;;;;;;;<.<6<@<A<B<C<D<E<F<G<H<V<W<]<c<l<<<<<<<<<<<<< ===#=)=*=i=m=o============張鼱媼鼦h/jh#t8hO%rhO%rH*hO%rhO%r6hO%r hmh$ hA^ hmh.h$ hNh 9h+/h$ihNh(H*hNh.H* h(H*h(hnih.h2hZq hmh6/8======>>> > >>>)>->4>9>]>c>d>e>~>>>>>>>>>>>>???? ? ? ??????"?#?$?,?-?2?D?E????ļ𸳬ݸh>hAhS\hxghxgH*hxghxg6hxg hAhA hAH*hNhZqh#hP h(H*hA^htH*hNhA^6h vhwhs hthth#t8h$ hth(7???? @@.@J@K@T@U@Y@b@@@@@@@@AA3AHAJAPARAbAfA}AABBB BBBBB B"B&B:B@BLBRB`BzB~BBBBBBBؼh@h@OJQJhw h@H*h@h@H*h@h+OOJQJh@h+OH*h@h+OhNhNH*hhyh)h{!hA hAhA hAH*hNhh6/hS\h>6BBBBBBC C"C0C>CfCrCtCxCzC|CCCCFDTD^DbDjDlDnDpDtDvDDDDDDDDDDDDDD2E6E>E@E阔h@h'0vOJQJh'0vh'0vH*h'0vhwh@h@H*OJQJh@h@OJQJh@h@H*hPhJ hJ OJQJh)h(h(OJQJh(h`6hh_hJ h@h{!h@h{!OJQJ.@EBEDEHEJE`E|EEEEEEEEF&F*F8FDFFFNFbFnFpFrFtFvFxFFFFFFFFFFFXGGGGGGGZH\H^H`HbHdHHHHHHHHHH$IVIdIIIȸȴȴȼȼȩhK"h,Bh,BOJQJh>bh+HhhAhyh,Bh)h`6h$3xh'0vOJQJh$3xhPh'0vh'0vH*h'0vh$3xh$3xH*OJQJ@IIIIIIIIIIIIIJJqJrJvJ{JJJJJ KKKKKK$K&K,K.K5KhK"hsh6;hh"; h^H*h^h^H*hNh^6hNh";H*h^hyhPmH sH hhPmH sH  h=h= h=H*h`6hPhh)h,BhN0LLLLLLLLLLLLUMjMMMN&N'N(NNNNNAOBOCOQOROSO_OnOOOOOOPiPoP|P}P~PPPϿ{v hO5 h:\5h:\h:\5hOh&% h&%h&%hih";hjh3Ih`6hl8h RH*h RhPhQ]_hNPhl8hl8h_H*h_h>hmhQ]_5 h6XA5 h";5hmh6XA5hmh^q5 hmhO,oPPPPPP>Q?QnQoQwQsj $IfgdTnakd$$Ifl4uy04 lahf4 dh$IfgdTn $da$gdO$a$gdO $da$gdk- PPPPPPPPPP1Q3Q8Q9Q:QQ?QaQcQhQiQjQlQoQpQqQwQxQ{QQQQQQQQQQQQQR RR(R׹whX7hOB*hphh]*hOB*hph jyhOB*hph jxhOB*hph jphOB*H*hph jGhOB*hph h hO hOH* hOH*hO hO5hOB*H*hphhOB*H*hphhOB*hph.wQQQQQQ$dh$Ifa$gdTnQQQQ RR>2222 $$Ifa$gdTnkdn$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4RRRR(R.R2kd$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTn(R4R8RHRJR\RbRfRxRRRRRRRRRRRR SS$S&S6SHSPSRShSzSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTT(T2222 $$Ifa$gdTnkd$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4RRRRRR2kd$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnRRRRRR2kd$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnRRRRRSS $$Ifa$gdTnS SSS&S*S>2222 $$Ifa$gdTnkd$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4*S.S4S6SBSHS2kd $$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnHSRSZSbSfShS2kd!$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnhStSzSSSSS $$Ifa$gdTnSSSSSS>2222 $$Ifa$gdTnkd"$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4SSSSSS2kd#$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnSSSSSS2kd$$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnSTTTT"T&T $$Ifa$gdTn&T(T4T2222 $$Ifa$gdTnkd%$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4NTRTVTXTZT2' $da$gdOkd&$$Ifl4ֈ x%wuRn04 lahf4 $$Ifa$gdTnZTTTTTUUU(U6UBUNUZUjUvUzzzzzzzzzzzz $$Ifa$gdTnokd'$$If$'$0$62 24ap $IfgdTnTTTTTTUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUVVVVVVVVV V V V V VĮĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĮĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝĝ hE>hOCJOJQJ^JaJhO hihOCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhOCJH*OJQJ^JaJhvhOCJOJQJ^JaJ hOhOCJOJQJ^JaJ#hOhOCJH*OJQJ^JaJhOhOCJaJ5vUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUVVV$$If]a$gdTnFf>2Ffh+ $$Ifa$gdTnVV V V VVVVVVV%V+V-V/V1V3V5V7V8V=V?VAVGVMVOVQVSVFf?Ff8 $$Ifa$gdTn VVVVVVVVVV,V-V.V/V0V1V2V3V4V5V6V7V8V;VV?V@VAVNVOVPVQVRVSVZV[V\V]V^V_V`VaVbVeVfVhViVjVkVlVmVnVoV|V}V~VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV hihOCJOJQJ^JaJ#hhOCJH*OJQJ^JaJhOCJOJQJ^JaJhOPSVYV[V]V_VaVbVgViVkVmVoVuV{V}VVVVVVVVVVVVVVFfJMFf~F $$Ifa$gdTnVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVFfZFfT $$Ifa$gdTnVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVWWWW W W WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW,W-W.W/W0W3W4W6W#hhOCJH*OJQJ^JaJhO hihOCJOJQJ^JaJhOCJOJQJ^JaJJVVVVVWW W WWWWWWWWWW%W+W-W/W0W5W7W9W;W=WFfzhFfa $$Ifa$gdTn6W7W8W9W:W;WW?W@WAWBWCWJWKWLWMWYWZW[W^WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWĹhOCJH*aJh#dhOCJH*aJh#dhOCJaJ hkThO hOH* hOH*h hOhvhOCJOJQJ^JaJ hA3hOCJOJQJ^JaJ<=W?WAWCWIWKWMWSWYWZW[W\W]W^WW $IfgdTn $da$gdOFfFo $$Ifa$gdTnWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW $IfgdTnfkd*H*hG>hp<hG>0Jj{hmhG>UjhmhG>U hp<hG>huhuH* hp<h}_hp<h6XA5hp<hO%r5hp<hG>5hh`65 hhs"h;h+HhK" Z[iotx| !'(-027?@ACDFGüõõ hmh)LH hmhxuhxuh'5hZqhxu hmhp< hp<hp<hp<h'5 hmh' hmhs hsH* hmh8 h1h1h1h15 hmh1 hPh1 hxuh1h1h1h1H*2GQR\]_`lmruvw{+459:;>?h hjmHsHh hg#mHsH hg#hg#hj hjhj hjhg#hjhg#H*h' hxuhxu hmh6/ hmh' hsH* hmh8 hmhxuhxuh)LH5hxu hmh)LH6?@CIQRTU`!"138?@ABCǼǙǎǙǼzqfhvJh'mHsHhg#H*mHsHhuH*mHsHh hCmHsHh hZqmHsHh huH*mHsHh h)LH5mHsHh hxumHsHh h)LHmHsHh h'mHsHh hg#H*mHsHh hjmHsHh hg#5mHsHh hg#mHsH(Cy&'()*+RSzskssd_ZVRhjhu hg#H* huH* h h'h hxu5 h hxuh h)LH5 h h)LHhxuhvJmHsHhxuh'mHsHhg#H*mHsHhxuhuH*mHsHhsh'H*mHsHhxuh)LHmHsHhxuh)LH5mHsHhxuhxumHsHhvJh)LHmHsHhvJmHsHhvJhvJmHsH)eh]hgd1 &`#$gd1 $da$gd  $da$gdk $da$gd'SVcdefghtv|VZ^orx~ƿƬƴơۘ~shsh\hsh h^5mHsHh hxumHsHh h^mHsHh hg#H*mHsHh huH*mHsHUh> huH*hk hmhxuhxuhk5hxu hPhxu hxuhxu hmhk huhk huh' hg#H*huhuH* huhuhuhjhjhj5$hing, Germany, 1997 18 M. Chiari, L. Giuntini, P.A. Mando and N. Taccetti, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 184, 309 (2001). 19 R.O. Nelson, E.G. Bilpuch, G.E. Mitchel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 236, 128 (1985).     PAGE  PAGE 2 ~¸|xtph>ph+hwho}h10JmHnHu h10Jjh10JUh1jh1U hPhOhechec5B*hphhecB*hph h hecB*hmHphsHh hecmHsHh hecH*mHsHh h^mHsHh hxumHsH! $da$gd ,1h/ =!"#$% xDd b  c $A? ?3"`?2eɨæL&h?D`!eɨæL&h?`'dxڵV[OA>3 l+B$X/ ( 4 %MMZJ>xAx$/1&%QN#3{r.wΙ"( XitK{Q3agqCA],Pi R*?& m /O܀##;q3T$BVb&|j!/K* -r[2i;L=6Õe/Tn:0f {Vɖ{ϯ⨉Eu;U]Oeyz@ ;O}ykRyqo] Nq䫭1*+-8:d8Gy9jGZ{،FNٌ``fh:C~CaUt7)OnʥRJjg*⣒^I%U;JrM3}_9N))-fD{0}hE#L]W$B`CMiH7۵1 Ս]2N\"\fScH`jKo P^5j;Mz 2KCK^_[A񈓧+p4wu"C0; 4)bsZ<ɜ\0IDd \ \  c $A? ?#" `25tSiBťHu)?(%u`!m5tSiBťHu)?(%d`"!;xڵUKOQ>޶i.TB&nLHD64`KjRTmBPʆ.&DYe1V.L1XQCwZ(Fޙs}!( .=z:0Bp6h3aό;,PY f7p:Q|e9_|'ųK܀#4 }vISiGUW1e"+ /R`ཉȩh |Mps) &fHY;V~^Q*^*S38d]97/0^_89=ah$_&'@ aG\9OYm>aCX S`Ɍ}#5: l] W0LQ֘͒VUMĮYʔBh3_S,ul˷ !_̖BˆuC9rxn;q]'=zAomhmPpaZ ~L>!o%~#cwZho3x6p]X#- S Ub(tfxй17n POZ3iIBک 1ŌhwfcI^z!1;$S;|k-"rHuJ71Mܒ~#.v Pr {ղnԄ ƺԔ}-W}]%|J$A{[MĆBifP) a|eSInW)h_Dd b  c $A? ?3"`?2T%wb|~ q `!T%wb|~ q@ $`8PxڭVKOQ>ޖ02},P11t"2!Rn,%iA( QLDc4qacLLHVDsgzP_0{swι!P nlI;6JHF"4N6*Qa'.֍"BD۫YJȩG(A;>81=K*&W}f=;]!g[-*]R)ϏQ:Ytt 21#G'{Ȑp_, o}zͻЎN3 9 \#ҼS, ,d5Yj҂c& JϧFu]Mܔa/ߡ R4Č5=Z &,mؽ\y 3X)I:!7T-zXKM|Qٶ4Biiɮ˖ #aL0$Ud.¹FbeZK]Xż)LYi=J` MbC,ofoڒlvŲkrda:5=vF azvzVx?oSqR_vvok Uxp5t"=}8YN{S_b'2വ@\PR]M֔C9T[?ByBJKmHMPx7S3([U N`焁F$.z.,` df1bcj0W!vy4b1WgxxY?W7~35Bc6  z!#iZ_8|.t*:,/ a^`}YG^w@N^jF⃑H Ր4\qצ]:o1Dd h\  c $A? ?#" `2D?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry( F@ Data z}WordDocument'.ObjectPool*Pգ @ _1229242357 FPգ Pգ Ole CompObjiObjInfo  !"#$%&),-./258;<?BCDEFGHIJKMNOPQRSTVWXYZ[\]^_`ac FMathType 5.0 Equation MathType EFEquation.DSMT49qJ DSMT5WinAllBasicCodePagesTimes New RomanSymbolCourier NewMT Extra!/ED/APG_APAPAE%B_AC_AE*_HA@AHA*_D_E_E_A   ds NEquation Native _1212388548 FPգ Pգ Ole  CompObj i dWE"-DE Au "- DE AlN 2,q()== A N QWq()N N FMathType 5.0 Equation MathType EFEquation.DSMT49qObjInfo Equation Native _1229242461FPգ Pգ Ole  DSMT5WinAllBasicCodePagesTimes New RomanSymbolCourier NewMT Extra!/ED/APG_APAPAE%B_AC_AE*_HA@AHA*_D_E_E_A   ds Au dWE"- DE Au 2,q()== A Au QWq()N Au FMathType 5.0 Equation MathType EFEquation.DSMT49qJÚ XDSMT5WinAllBasicCodePagesTimes New RomanSymbolCourier NewMT Extra!/ED/APG_APAPAE%B_AC_AE*_HA@AHA*_D_E_E_A   ds NCompObjiObjInfoEquation Native _1212391567FPգ Pգ  dWE"-DE Au "- DE AlN 2,q()== A N A Au  N Au N N  ds Au dWE"- DE Au 2,q()Ole 'CompObj(iObjInfo*Equation Native + FMathType 5.0 Equation MathType EFEquation.DSMT49qlDSMT5WinAllBasicCodePagesTimes New RomanSymbolCourier NewMT Extra!/ED/APG_APAPAE%B_AC_AE*_HA@AHA*_D_E_E_A  DE Au_1240560067FPգ Pգ Ole 0CompObj1fObjInfo3 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qfXnI zI = s > ,l / l " FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS EqEquation Native 4t_1240560405"FPգ Pգ Ole 6CompObj 7fuation Equation.39qfӈnI zI  s = s,l+2 / s,l [] 1/2 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qObjInfo!9Equation Native :_1240561939$FPգ Pգ Ole =CompObj#%>fObjInfo&@Equation Native A1TablenftlyII  s < ,l =1"1+ s < 2 , s < ,l+2 =(1") s < 2 1+ s < 2 , s > ,l =1+ s > 2 , s > ,l+2 = s > 2 1+ s > 2 .Oh+'0 ,8DX x   `Elastic scattering in the proton-nitrogen and pr96}bAaqR/j ׉-_^] sF&n 51SARW9xM%?_1|:з8Dd B  S A? 2cD ֽQpY~`!vcD ֽQpY `dDxR=K`QMElwQhB`'8/qww@/}r.us d6!j)MSV M4*}w% j9{8fW9{Y# |O/57"@6AD'\Xj^"#^{<GiYZw2b. &2zA:H GUGZuΌ/U7Σ0î؎;, 㻒(&3VySBZyMEݪe̿t?"3YF>Q$Z'q'`Ptgi4epDd B  S A? 2}wzx/ `!}wzx/ ~  &@C|xJAg&w1DA F%ARbeIx3$],}˼؊ID;s5wZą曝wv! {@Ya$ 5 Q G/N#gkn = 2a(>żyI8p>YQ}nMk̢5u$Z#mߪj^5q[}$8tGss6|C75?,Z2XAZr%3ԸCbt\EkI7{Dd B  S A? 21 LgSBtubLX H`! LgSBtubLXX F)(xMhAch*֢-mЃb/* !VH"-(T'AГKP," sA<"H&{7of&/qAD]yL y3Juz#4#;X0/*bU$Kjq%W艼sYB D鱩ˣ3W2,dSVĻ:c'{lQ\֭ >XzŭV ٦zfx> `/g;'KcyO@%u2{}~ehUlB(PoPҡ'}a6e`ccRnLvcRMyqZw1kOn 0wGmyϿ%[GfJ&r/ wO;Cwb}Z}bEa-| /[M6[3L\ 2sOΨ$`*}z'_^=a*/7aacUAeذ~cbz}XNB1L"{sqf!/1$U`[vp=?@ABCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD E!EEEFFGGGHZHHH?IIIJRJJJ@KK)LeLLMMMMN!z !Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!4 !Y!Y! !Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!!Y!Y!Y!C`! !!:!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y@@@ 'NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH T@T O Heading 4$$dh@&a$B*aJhphtHDA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List6U@6 G> Hyperlink >*B*phDZ@D a(B Plain TextCJOJQJ^JaJB'B OyComment ReferenceCJaJ<"< Oy Comment TextCJaJ@j!"@ OyComment Subject5\H@BH Oy Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJNB@RN ec Body Text$dha$B*aJhphtHj@cj O Table Grid7:V0@&@q@ |Footnote ReferenceH*4 @4 1Footer  !.)@. 1 Page NumberN N z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z zoU V># %,4';>CDGMN     mZ[9:;noT ^     =>QR"#JKbcxy d!!"#>#?#%%%%y.2%;&;';(;8;9;====>>>>>>>??2?q?r??????@@ @@@@$@'@,@0@2@4@5@;@>@C@G@I@K@L@R@U@Z@^@`@b@c@i@m@r@v@x@{@|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AAA A AAAAAA!A"A(A+A0A5A8A:A;AAAEAJANAPARASATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBB B BBBBBBB$B&B(B*B,B.B0B2B4B5B:BC@CBCDCFCLCRCTCVCWC\C^C`CbCdCfChCjCpCrCtCzCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDD D DDDDDD!D%D)D,D0D3D6D9D:D@DFDLDRDXD]DbDgDlDqDvD{DDDDDDDDD! !o%!Y!Y!Y!{5!Y!Y!Y! !!} !Y! !4 !!7P!!4 !!!! !!Y!Y!Y!{5!c! !!De !^!3!!o%!Y!Y!Y!e!UE!!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!*!Y!Y!Y!id!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!!!!YEEzEEEEzzzzzzzzzzzzz!Y$_v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:xv:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:v:x!Y!Y!Y!Yw"BBBBBBBBBBBBBBeBeBBBBBBBBBBBBBZBBBBBBBesBBBBBBB!Y!v:!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!4 !Y!4 !Y!x!Y!O !Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!Y!4 !Y!4 !4 !Y!Y!4 !4 !Yy!Z[9:;noT ^     =>QR"#JKbcxy d!!"#>#?#%%%%y.2%;&;';(;8;9;====>>>>>>>??2?q?r??????@@ @@@@$@'@,@0@2@4@5@;@>@C@G@I@K@L@R@U@Z@^@`@b@c@i@m@r@v@x@{@|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AAA A AAAAAA!A"A(A+A0A5A8A:A;AAAEAJANAPARASATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBB B BBBBBBB$B&B(B*B,B.B0B2B4B5B:BC@CBCDCFCLCRCTCVCWC\C^C`CbCdCfChCjCpCrCtCzCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDD D DDDDDD!D%D)D,D0D3D6D9D:D@DFDLDRDXD]DbDgDlDqDvD{DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD E!EEEFFGGGGHZHHH?IIIJRJJJ@KK)LeLLMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNN0000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Z[9:;noT ^     =>QR"#JKbcxy d!!"#>#?#%%%%y.2%;&;';(;8;9;====>>>>>>>??2?q?r??????@@ @@@@$@'@,@0@2@4@5@;@>@C@G@I@K@L@R@U@Z@^@`@b@c@i@m@r@v@x@{@|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AAA A AAAAAA!A"A(A+A0A5A8A:A;AAAEAJANAPARASATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBB B BBBBBBB$B&B(B*B,B.B0B2B4B5B:BC@CBCDCFCLCRCTCVCWC\C^C`CbCdCfChCjCpCrCtCzCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDD D DDDDDD!D%D)D,D0D3D6D9D:D@DFDLDRDXD]DbDgDlDqDvD{DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD E!EEEFFGGGGHZHHH?IIIJRJJJ@KK)LeLLMMMMMMMN0000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000K0K0 00 2x`|X  $$$' 1SjC!#'1)|+-/14(8;=?B@EILP(RT VV6WWbZG?CS~,/01235789;<=>?@BCDEFGHIJLPbehjnwxyz{|~&2oPwQQR.RJRvRRRRS*SHShSSSSS&TNTZTvUVSVVV=WWWU-46:AKMNOQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`acdfgiklmuv}.#;=)AC d!x!z!#2#4#GGGH5HXHN:::::::XX  '!!12/X2$-8 amnUGb$-Êٲ ޒl4nu@10(  B S  ?N OLE_LINK3 OLE_LINK4KKN(L(LN"6  :7 |L8 L9 L:  >k?n?????@@AACCCCCCCCCCCDDD DDDDDD!D$D%D(D,D/D3D5DDDEE+F.FFFOGRG`HgHiHmHoHvHHHHHHHHHGIMIRIXIJJ;J>J@JCJEJIJKJQJRJTJUJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJKK!K#K3K5K8K:K?K@KBKCKKKKKKKKKKKKKLLL,L7L9L=L?LDLKLOLvLzL|LLLLLLLMMMMrMtMxMyM~MMMMMMMMNQ ! a d OR`k.3txKP9B]_JM !!""**C/F/#0%000]1_122H4L4556 67799(=,=? ?%?)?2?:?;?p?r?z???DDDD!E'EEEFFoHwHRJJJJJ?K@KKKLL'L)L7LFLOLQLdL|LLLLMMMMMMMMMN:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ?@ @TAACCDMMMMNMMN;ut^`o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.;u           )=s"w# m R 6 yx5XH)&r9+HP]:# %i>H J {!g#(-*x*+k-j=.|.h/+/22\Z3#t8 9;";6;@;j;<p<G>s?6XAa(B7WB!CE05EOE-]E`FMFxF)LHvJ}JIL MMvNO+OvP R0CRbR8S!STU hUqV5}W XHL[X]A^Q]_3z_`*a>b<@bQb'Vb~Ac#dNdexgni/j7=jkjl1+m1o+9o>pC@pZq^qO%r^sr txu v'0v:v,zv+hw$3xOyz|o}l8$i3I 6:\ 91Nv4|2!X%158,BhFPB;@C 5D(>6/]go,;>j'Tn.I`xr[+p$.%ec-j^yj/sKths V>Pt!~_NPmD #Z$ uP>%: r! r"A^~}>3*8[u=sK"CGO/3&%nMS\|ET2c1y2<u}_BXxI (UnC.Q;`6O%qmno%%>>r??????@@ @@@@$@'@,@0@2@4@5@;@>@C@G@I@K@L@R@U@Z@^@`@b@c@i@m@r@v@x@{@|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AAA A AAAAAA!A"A(A+A0A5A8A:A;AAAEAJANAPARASATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABBBB B BBBBBBB$B&B(B*B,B.B0B2B4B5B:BC@CBCDCFCLCRCTCVCWC\C^C`CbCdCfChCjCpCrCtCzCCCCCCCCCCCD DDDD%D,D3D9D:D@DFDLDRDXD]DbDgDlDqDvD{DDDDNy_0@$%A45678'@'A'B&DFGMN``@```8@`"`$`L@`B`D`F`H`@`R`T`@`@``@`@Unknowniva bogdanovic radovic kalish RafiGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial?5 z Courier New5& zaTahoma"qhhdžeǦ 9B' 9B'!24dMM 3qHP)?6XA2\Elastic scattering in the proton-nitrogen and proton-oxygen systems near the Coulomb barrieriva bogdanovic radoviciva bogdanovic radovic