Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 358714
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections // Croatian Medical Journal, 46 (2005), 6; 957-963 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 358714 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy for treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections
Autori
Rakić, Mladen ; Popović, Drago ; Rakić, Mislav ; Družijanić, Nikica ; Lojpur, Mihajlo ; Hall, Brian A. ; Williams, Brent A. ; Sprung, Juraj
Izvornik
Croatian Medical Journal (0353-9504) 46
(2005), 6;
957-963
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Laparotomy; intra-abdominal; infection
Sažetak
Aim: To compare morbidity and mortality of patients with severe intra-abdominal infections after two types of surgical treatment, on-demand ("wait and see") relaparotomy and modified planned relaparotomy. Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 65 patients with severe peritonitis surgically treated in two Croatian hospitals. In one hospital, 34 patients were treated on-demand, and in another hospital 31 patients were treated by planned relaparotomy. We compared severe postoperative complications, mortality, and length of hospital stay in the two groups of patients. Results: Severity of patient's disease, as measured from preoperative group-average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, was comparable in both on-demand and planned relaparotomy groups. The mortality rate was higher in patients operated on-demand (59% vs 29%, P=0.024). In nonadjusted model, the relative risk of dying was 2.5-fold higher for patients treated by on-demand operation in comparison with planned relaparatomy (P=0.030). However, after the adjustment of the survival data for individual patient's sex and APACHE II scores, the difference in the relative risk became non-significant (P=0.178). The patients who died had higher APACHE II scores (26.1+/-8.9 vs 19.7+/-5.9, P=0.009). Relative risk of dying per 5-point increase in APACHE II score was 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.51 ; P=0.039), irrespective of the surgical technique. Conclusions: Patients with severe peritonitis treated with planned relaparotomy seemed to have lower mortality. However, the relative risk of dying was not statistically different between the on-demand and planned relaparotomy groups after adjustment for preoperative APACHE II scores. The severity of disease rather than surgical approach plays more important role in survival of these patients.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Profili:
Juraj Šprung
(autor)
Nikica Družijanić
(autor)
Mihajlo Lojpur
(autor)
Mladen Rakić
(autor)
Drago Popović
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE