Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 349561
Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments
Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments // Ius Commune Conference: Civil Procedure Workshop
Liège, Belgija, 2007. (pozvano predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 349561 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Burden of proof v. intime conviction: Two strategies of explaining factual findings in court judgments
Autori
Uzelac, Alan
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
Ius Commune Conference: Civil Procedure Workshop
Mjesto i datum
Liège, Belgija, 29.11.2007. - 30.11.2007
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Pozvano predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
civil procedure; intime conviction; burden of proof; evidence; court judgments
Sažetak
The proper reasoning is an essential part of court judgments, so also the ECHR. However, when explaining factual findings, judges basically have on disposal two strategies - one based on the conviction (fr. - intime conviction), and one based on the burden of proof rules. The lecture discusses the consequences of both strategies.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
066-0662501-2521 - Harmonizacija građanskog procesnog prava s pravnim sustavom Europske unije (Dika, Mihajlo, MZOS ) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Alan Uzelac
(autor)
