Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 255620
When Rights Conflict
When Rights Conflict // The 4th Annual International Scientific Conference » ; ; The Lošinj Days of Bioethics« ; ; Main topic: » ; ; Bioethics and the New Era« ; ; Croatian Association of Philosophy - Section for Bioethics, Mali Lošinj, Croatia
Mali Lošinj, Hrvatska, 2005. (demonstracija, nije recenziran, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 255620 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
When Rights Conflict
Autori
Žitinski, Maja
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
The 4th Annual International Scientific Conference » ; ; The Lošinj Days of Bioethics« ; ; Main topic: » ; ; Bioethics and the New Era« ; ; Croatian Association of Philosophy - Section for Bioethics, Mali Lošinj, Croatia
Mjesto i datum
Mali Lošinj, Hrvatska, 13.06.2005. - 15.06.2005
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Demonstracija
Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran
Ključne riječi
autonomy; rights; moral judgment; rational; irrational
Sažetak
The paper investigates why impartiality or rationality are ideals worth striving for. It deals not only with an inquiry into normative ethical search for valid moral principles, but also for the meaning of key meta-ethical concepts such as “ autonomy” and “ rights” . The portrait of the ideal moral judgment plays an important role in the examination of both: our own views and the views of others. Bioethical genuine quest for a correct method all moral agents ought morally to be guided while answering moral questions, refers to the conviction that coming as close as possible to fulfilling the ideal moral judgment is rational. Rights themselves are distinctive moral “ commodities” , that is, to have a right to anything means to have a very strong moral and legal claim upon it. It is the strongest of all moral claims that all men can assert. Since human rights must be possessed by all human beings and only by human beings, it would be irrational to distinguish among persons, deny human equity and preserve rights only for the few. Rights entail objects and areas within which every human being is entitled to act without further permission or assent. Some philosophers point out to the important connection between the goals of normative ethics and the concept of an ideal moral judgment. The approach to moral questions must be free from fault and error and other objections raised against the considered method in placing a justified limit on how others may treat the person possessing the right.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija
