Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 251426
Heat treated GIC fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow up
Heat treated GIC fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow up // 8th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, Amsterdam, 2006. / Curson, Martin (ur.).
Leeds: European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2006. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 251426 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Heat treated GIC fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow up
Autori
Glavina, Domagoj ; Škrinjarić, Kristina ; Negovetić Vranić, Dubravka ; Škrinjarić, Ilija
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
8th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, Amsterdam, 2006.
/ Curson, Martin - Leeds : European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2006
Skup
8th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry
Mjesto i datum
Amsterdam, Nizozemska, 08.06.2006. - 11.06.2006
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
GIC; fissure sealants
Sažetak
Aim. It has been suggested that application of heat during setting of glass ionomer cements (GIC) can improve mechanical properties of material and retain the same or even higher level of fluoride release. This also might improve retention rate of GIC sealant. The aim of this study was to asses retention rate of GIC fissure sealants heated during setting time. Methods. Hundred and twelve teeth with well-delineated fissure morphology divided in three groups were sealed with composite resin and GIC.In control group A that comprised 56 teeth composite resin was used (Helioseal F, Vivadent). GIC (Fuji 7, GC) was applied using split mouth design with conditioning (group B: 26 teeth) and without surface conditioning (group c: 30 teeth). GIC was heated with external heat source (Elipar Highlight, Espe) during setting time according to manufacturers instructiones. Fissure sealants were evaluated one year after clinical service. Results. Retention rate in group A was 80, 36% after one year of clinical service. Group B showed retention rate of 30, 77%, and group C of 26, 67%. After one year two new caries lesions were detected in group B and C (GIC groups). Significant differences in retention of sealant between two GIC groups, neither differences in incidence of new caries lesions. Conclusion. It could be concluded that retention rate of GIC sealing treated with heat during setting time was significantly lower than retention of conventional composite resin. The heating procedure during setting of GIc sealants could not be recommended as routine clinical practice.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
0065006
Ustanove:
Stomatološki fakultet, Zagreb
Profili:
Kristina Goršeta
(autor)
Domagoj Glavina
(autor)
Ilija Škrinjarić
(autor)
Dubravka Negovetić Vranić
(autor)