Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 208407
Generational similarities and differences in researchers' professional ethics: An empirical comparison
Generational similarities and differences in researchers' professional ethics: An empirical comparison // Scientometrics, 62 (2005), 1; 27-51 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 208407 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Generational similarities and differences in researchers' professional ethics: An empirical comparison
Autori
Prpić, Katarina
Izvornik
Scientometrics (0138-9130) 62
(2005), 1;
27-51
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
scientists' professional ethics; cognitive values/norms; social values/norms; questionable research practices; young researchers; eminent scientists
Sažetak
This study, based on two empirical investigations undertaken in Croatia on samples of 320 eminent and 840 young researchers, shows a comparison between the professional values/norms of these groups (normative level of research ethics), as well as a comparison (of perceptions) about the frequency of ethically questionable and unacceptable behaviour of researchers in Croatian research institutions (behavioural level of ethos). Science ethics includes a core of cognitive and social standards about which there is relatively high consensus in both groups of researchers. Their cognitive standards correspond to epistemological realism with an accent on objective, reliable, measurable and precise new knowledge. Their basic social values include the broadest social responsibility, responsibility towards colleagues and students, and professionality in relation with funders and/or clients. Thus, research ethos is a combination of traditional cognitive norms and new socially-engaged values. However, research ethics is not a static or homogeneous set of professional values and norms. Young scientists value cognitive norms relating to basic research lower, but rank some cognitive standards more closely linked with applied empirical research higher. Considering the social dimensions of research ethics, young researchers rate traditional academic values of collegiality, communality and autonomy less important than do eminent scientists, but they hold professionalism and establishing research networks more important. As expected, cognitive and social values and norms are not strictly followed on the level of professional practice. In their everyday professional life eminent and young researchers experience particular questionable research practices that could harm research work and results, and impair collegial relations in science, more often than they encounter breaking social norms that harm or even threaten participants in and users of scientific professional work.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Sociologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
0100001
Ustanove:
Institut za društvena istraživanja , Zagreb
Profili:
Katarina Prpić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
Uključenost u ostale bibliografske baze podataka::
- Biological Abstracts
- Chemical Abstracts
- The INSPEC Science Abstracts series
- Social Sciences Index
- Sociological Abstracts
- BIOSIS
- CompuMath Citation Index
- Information Science & Technology Abstracts (ISTA)
- ISI Alerting Services
- LISA (Library and Information Sciences Abstracts)
- PASCAL
- SCOPUS
- Social SciSearch