Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 165062
Comparison of Different Gravity Field Solution Methods Applied to CHAMP Gravity Field Modelling
Comparison of Different Gravity Field Solution Methods Applied to CHAMP Gravity Field Modelling // Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on International Gravity Field Research, 1016-6254 / Maurers, B. ; Pail, R. (ur.).
Beč: Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 2004. str. 45-50 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 165062 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Different Gravity Field Solution Methods Applied to CHAMP Gravity Field Modelling
Autori
Wermuth, M. ; Gerlach, Ch. ; Švehla, Dražen ; Földvary, L.
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on International Gravity Field Research, 1016-6254
/ Maurers, B. ; Pail, R. - Beč : Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, 2004, 45-50
Skup
1st Workshop on International Gravity Field Research, Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik
Mjesto i datum
Beč, Austrija, 2004
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
CHAMP; GRACE; GOCE gravity field solutions; computing methods
Sažetak
The new gravity field satellite missions CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE are expected to deliver a new generation of gravity field models with unprecedented accuracy and resolution. However the large number of measurements as well as the large number of unknowns are posing new challenges in terms of computing strategies. Several competing methods for gravity field analysis, each having advantages and drawbacks, have been developed during the past years. A selection of them, namely the Direct Approach, the Pre-Conditioned Conjugate-Gradient Multiple-Adjustment (PCGMA) (cf. Schuh, 1996) and the Lumped-Coefficient Approach (cf. Sneeuw, 2000) are compared and evaluated here with real data delivered by CHAMP. The different gravity field solution methods and the resulting potential coefficients are tested and compared in terms of computation time, accuracy and spatial resolution.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Geodezija