Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 161667

The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach


Mrak, Goran; Paladino, Josip; Mihaljević, Dinko; Jednačak, Hrvoje
The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach // 3rd CENS meeting
Ljubljana, Slovenija, 2004. (predavanje, nije recenziran, sažetak, stručni)


CROSBI ID: 161667 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach

Autori
Mrak, Goran ; Paladino, Josip ; Mihaljević, Dinko ; Jednačak, Hrvoje

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, stručni

Skup
3rd CENS meeting

Mjesto i datum
Ljubljana, Slovenija, 01.09.2004. - 04.09.2004

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Nije recenziran

Ključne riječi
keyhole; minimally invasive neurosurgery

Sažetak
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the results of minimally invasive keyhole craniotomy and standard larger craniotomies in surgical treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Patients and Methods: Among 562 patients with intracranial aneurysms in a 7-year period, 427 patient was operated through small keyhole craniotomy, using the eyebrow keyhole approach in particular. During the same period the remaining135 patients were operated using standard larger approaches. Both groups were similarly mached according to the Hunt-Hess scale, and Glasgow outcome scale. Results: Comparison of surgical outcomes for both groups gave a similar result. We have found excellent and very good outcome (GOS 5 and 4) in 351 (82, 21%) patients from keyhole craniotomy group, and in standard craniotomy group the same outcome was found in 109 patients (80, 74%). The mortality rate was 0, 93% for keyhole group of patients and 2, 22% for standard craniotomy group. Conclusions: Our study has shown no difference in outcome for both groups. Results are especially good for keyhole group of patients. The advantages of the keyhole concept should be considered as a good alternative to endovascular treatment in some patients.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
0108025

Profili:

Avatar Url Josip Paladino (autor)

Avatar Url Goran Mrak (autor)


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Mrak, Goran; Paladino, Josip; Mihaljević, Dinko; Jednačak, Hrvoje
The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach // 3rd CENS meeting
Ljubljana, Slovenija, 2004. (predavanje, nije recenziran, sažetak, stručni)
Mrak, G., Paladino, J., Mihaljević, D. & Jednačak, H. (2004) The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach. U: 3rd CENS meeting.
@article{article, author = {Mrak, Goran and Paladino, Josip and Mihaljevi\'{c}, Dinko and Jedna\v{c}ak, Hrvoje}, year = {2004}, keywords = {keyhole, minimally invasive neurosurgery}, title = {The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach}, keyword = {keyhole, minimally invasive neurosurgery}, publisherplace = {Ljubljana, Slovenija} }
@article{article, author = {Mrak, Goran and Paladino, Josip and Mihaljevi\'{c}, Dinko and Jedna\v{c}ak, Hrvoje}, year = {2004}, keywords = {keyhole, minimally invasive neurosurgery}, title = {The keyhole approach in aneurysm surgery. Comparation between keyhole approach and standard approach}, keyword = {keyhole, minimally invasive neurosurgery}, publisherplace = {Ljubljana, Slovenija} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font