Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1278438
Technical Solutions Supporting the Online RTBF in the CJEU and ECHR Jurisprudence
Technical Solutions Supporting the Online RTBF in the CJEU and ECHR Jurisprudence // MIPRO 2023 46th ICT and Electronics Convention Proceedings / Skala, Karolj (ur.).
Rijeka: Hrvatska udruga za informacijsku i komunikacijsku tehnologiju, elektroniku i mikroelektroniku - MIPRO, 2023. str. 1672-1678 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1278438 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Technical Solutions Supporting the Online RTBF in the CJEU and ECHR Jurisprudence
Autori
Gumzej, Nina
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
MIPRO 2023 46th ICT and Electronics Convention Proceedings
/ Skala, Karolj - Rijeka : Hrvatska udruga za informacijsku i komunikacijsku tehnologiju, elektroniku i mikroelektroniku - MIPRO, 2023, 1672-1678
Skup
MIPRO 2023 46th ICT and Electronics Convention
Mjesto i datum
Opatija, Hrvatska, 22.05.2023. - 25.05.2023
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
RTBF ; geo-filtering ; Google v. CNIL ; delisting ; de-indexing ; GC and Others ; TU and RE v Google ; Biancardi v Italy ; Hurbain v Belgium ; blocking online content ; digital archives ; search engine
Sažetak
Legal solutions toward restricting online accessibility of content relevant to one’s privacy are valueless without interdisciplinary cooperation and acknowledgment of technological developments. One example lies in the affirmed use of geo-filtering technology to support the scope of delisting, which ensures the more effective RTBF as a specific right related to the right to erasure, which is reserved for data subjects and implemented by search engines under EU law. Other two concern the measures of rearranging search results, and adding warnings on initiated proceedings in search engine results, which the CJEU acknowledged in certain cases of unsuccessful delisting requests, and which are according to their aim of providing currently accurate data/information traditionally directed toward original content producers. Fourth example lies in the recognized role of de-indexing technology that enables online publishers to restrict accessibility of their own content, and supports the right to private life under ECHR jurisprudence. The paper discusses and critically assesses those solutions. Delisting is shown to be less restrictive than de-indexing for the freedom of expression and at the same time less effective data protection-wise, taking into account also limited territorial scope, and is as such also consumed by de-indexing. Innovative CJEU measures may provide fair solutions for affected data subjects, but still require legal justification and proof of operation in the practice of search engines.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo