Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1276381
Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation
Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation // World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16 (2021), 1; 6, 10 doi:10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1276381 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Trauma quality indicators: internationally
approved core factors for trauma management
quality evaluation
Autori
Coccolini, Federico ; and the WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel ; Kluger, Yoram ; Moore, Ernest E. ; Maier, Ronald V. ; Coimbra, Raul ; Ordoñez, Carlos ; Ivatury, Rao ; Kirkpatrick, Andrew W. ; Biffl, Walter ; Sartelli, Massimo ; Hecker, Andreas ; Ansaloni, Luca ; Leppaniemi, Ari ; Reva, Viktor ; Civil, Ian ; Vega, Felipe ; Chiarugi, Massimo ; Chichom-Mefire, Alain ; Sakakushev, Boris ; Peitzman, Andrew ; Chiara, Osvaldo ; Abu-Zidan, Fikri ; Maegele, Marc ; Miccoli, Mario ; Chirica, Mircea ; Khokha, Vladimir ; Sugrue, Michael ; Fraga, Gustavo P. ; Otomo, Yasuhiro ; Baiocchi, Gian Luca ; Catena, Fausto
Kolaboracija
WSES Trauma Quality Indicators Expert Panel
Izvornik
World Journal of Emergency Surgery (1749-7922) 16
(2021), 1;
6, 10
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Analysis ; Data ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Outcome ; Performance ; Planning ; Product ; System ; World
Sažetak
Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference RESULTS: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post- traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.
Izvorni jezik
Hrvatski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE