Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1260528

Machine Learning and Essentialism


Šekrst, Kristina; Skansi, Sandro
Machine Learning and Essentialism // Philosophical Problems in Science, 73 (2023), 171-196 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1260528 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Machine Learning and Essentialism

Autori
Šekrst, Kristina ; Skansi, Sandro

Izvornik
Philosophical Problems in Science (2451-0602) 73 (2023); 171-196

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
essentialism ; machine learning ; accidental properties ; similarity-based approach ; pattern recognition ; modal necessity

Sažetak
Machine learning and essentialism have been connected in the past by various researchers, in order to state that the main paradigm in machine learning processes is equivalent to choosing the “essential” attributes for the machine to search for. Our goal in this paper is to show that there are connections between machine learning and essen- tialism, but only for some kinds of machine learning, and often not including deep learning methods. Similarity-based approaches, more connected to the overall prototype theory, spanning from psychology and linguistics, seem more suited for pattern recognition and complex deep-learning issues, while for classification problems, mostly for unsupervised learning, essentialism seems like the best choice. In order to illustrate the difference better, we will connect both paths to their sources in other disciplines and see how human psychology influences our decision in machine-learning modeling as well. This leads to a philosophically very interesting consequence: even in the setting of supervised machine learning, essences are not present in data, but in targets, which in turn means that the categories which purport to be essences are in fact human-made, and hand-coded in the targets. The success of machine learning, therefore, does not give any substantial evidence for the independent existence of essential properties. Our stance here is to state that neither the existence nor the lack of “essential” properties in machine learning can lead to metaphysical, i.e., ontological claims.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski



POVEZANOST RADA


Profili:

Avatar Url Sandro Skansi (autor)

Avatar Url Kristina Šekrst (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

zfn.edu.pl www.researchgate.net

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Šekrst, Kristina; Skansi, Sandro
Machine Learning and Essentialism // Philosophical Problems in Science, 73 (2023), 171-196 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Šekrst, K. & Skansi, S. (2023) Machine Learning and Essentialism. Philosophical Problems in Science, 73, 171-196.
@article{article, author = {\v{S}ekrst, Kristina and Skansi, Sandro}, year = {2023}, pages = {171-196}, keywords = {essentialism, machine learning, accidental properties, similarity-based approach, pattern recognition, modal necessity}, journal = {Philosophical Problems in Science}, volume = {73}, issn = {2451-0602}, title = {Machine Learning and Essentialism}, keyword = {essentialism, machine learning, accidental properties, similarity-based approach, pattern recognition, modal necessity} }
@article{article, author = {\v{S}ekrst, Kristina and Skansi, Sandro}, year = {2023}, pages = {171-196}, keywords = {essentialism, machine learning, accidental properties, similarity-based approach, pattern recognition, modal necessity}, journal = {Philosophical Problems in Science}, volume = {73}, issn = {2451-0602}, title = {Machine Learning and Essentialism}, keyword = {essentialism, machine learning, accidental properties, similarity-based approach, pattern recognition, modal necessity} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font