Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1252584
What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study
What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A Randomized Cross-Over Study // Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 10 (2023), 2; 44, 16 doi:10.3390/jcdd10020044 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1252584 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
What Is the Smallest Change in Pulse Wave Velocity
Measurements That Can Be Attributed to Clinical
Changes in Arterial Stiffness with Certainty: A
Randomized Cross-Over Study
Autori
Podrug, Mario ; Šunjić, Borna ; Koren, Pjero ; Đogaš, Varja ; Mudnić, Ivana ; Boban, Mladen ; Jerončić, Ana
Izvornik
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease (2308-3425) 10
(2023), 2;
44, 16
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
arterial stiffness ; pulse wave velocity ; reproducibility ; repeatability ; minimal clinically important difference ; MCID ; intra-subject variability ; measurement errors
Sažetak
Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a direct measure of arterial stiffness, is a promising biomarker of cardiovascular risk and a cardiovascular surrogate outcome. The resolution for detecting its smallest clinically significant change is dependent on the expected reproducibility, but there is currently no consensus on this. We estimated the PWV reproducibility in a range of intra-subject values that were observed over a 2 week period in a broad range of participants and under clinically relevant experimental conditions (two observers, morning/afternoon sessions, and number of visits) using SphygmoCor and Arteriograph devices. Each participant was recorded 12 times with each device over three visits, one week apart, and two morning and two afternoon recordings were taken per visit. The factors affecting reproducibility and the discrepancies between the consecutive PWV measurements for each device were also examined using multilevel mixed-effect models. We show that current PWV estimation guidance recommending 2 + 1 measurements is suboptimal because the PWV range was outside of the 1 m/s threshold for most of the participants, which is proposed as a minimal clinically important difference. The best reproducibility was yielded with median of four measurements and a 1.1 m/s threshold. Although PWV reproducibility and repeatability are frequently used interchangeably in studies, we demonstrated that despite their relative measures of variability (e.g., coefficient of variation) being comparable, their ranges revealed a clinically significant difference between them. We also found that different physiological variables were predictors of the discrepancy between the consecutive measurements made by the two devices, which is likely due to their distinct modes of operation. The evidence base for PWV reproducibility is limited, and more research is needed to deepen our understanding of the variation in arterial stiffness over time, as well as fluctuations within a population group and in an intervention setting.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Profili:
Mladen Boban
(autor)
Varja Đogaš
(autor)
Ana Jerončić
(autor)
Mario Podrug
(autor)
Borna Šunjić
(autor)
Ivana Mudnić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus