Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1252194
Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States
Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States // The American journal of cardiology, 179 (2022), 1-10 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.008 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1252194 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Influence of the Danish Co-morbidity Index Score
on the Treatment and Outcomes of 2.5 Million
Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction
in the United States
Autori
Sokhal, Balamrit Singh ; Matetić, Andrija ; Abhishek ; Freeman, Philip ; Shanmuganathan, Jan Walter Dhillon ; Mohamed, Mohamed O. ; Mallen, Christian ; Mamas, Mamas A.
Izvornik
The American journal of cardiology (0002-9149) 179
(2022);
1-10
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
COMORBIDITY MEASURES ; IMPACT ; RISK ; MORTALITY ; PERFORMANCE ; PREVALENCE ; MANAGEMENT ; DISEASE ; PEOPLE
Sažetak
This study aimed to determine the association between the Danish Co-morbidity Index for Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANCAMI) and restricted DANCAMI (rDANCAMI) scores and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with AMI. Using the National Inpatient Sample, all AMI hospitalizations were stratified into four groups based on their DANCAMI and rDANCAMI score (0 ; 1 to 3 ; 4 to 5 ; >= 6). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, and receipt of coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. Multivariate logistic regression was used to deter-mine adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Patients with DANCAMI risk score >= 6 were more likely to suffer mortality (aOR 2.30, 95% CI 2.24 to 2.37) and bleeding (aOR 5.85, 95% CI 5.52 to 6.21) and were less likely to receive coronary angiography (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.34) and percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 0.29, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.29) compared with patients with DANCAMI score of 0. Similar results were observed for the rDANCAMI score. In conclusion, increased DAN-CAMI and rDANCAMI scores were associated with worse in- hospital outcomes in patients with AMI and lower odds of invasive management. The use of co- morbidity scores identifies patients at high risk of adverse outcomes and highlights disparities in care.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE