Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1251237
Potential predatory journals are colonizing the ICMJE recommendations list of followers
Potential predatory journals are colonizing the ICMJE recommendations list of followers // Netherlands journal of medicine, 77 (2019), 2; 92-96 (međunarodna recenzija, kratko priopcenje, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1251237 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Potential predatory journals are colonizing the
ICMJE recommendations list of followers
Autori
Dal-Re, R. ; Marusic, Ana
Izvornik
Netherlands journal of medicine (0300-2977) 77
(2019), 2;
92-96
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, kratko priopcenje, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Predatory journals ; medicine
Sažetak
Background. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has expressed its concerns about predatory journals using the list of ICMJE Recommendations (ICMJE-R) followers to “gain the appearance of legitimacy.” We assessed the presence of potential predatory journals on the ICMJE-R list and their adherence to ICMJE recommendations. Methods. A random sample of 350 journals from the estimated 3, 100-3, 200 biomedical journals listed as ICMJE-R followers was chosen. Data collected from the ICMJE and journal webpages in English were: adherence to six ICMJE-R policies/requirements, year of journal’s listing as ICMJE-R follower, discipline covered, publisher and its country of origin and existence of article processing charge. Potential predatory journal was considered as one open access journal not being a member of a recognized listing in COPE, DOAJ, OASPA, AJOL and/or INASP. Results. Thirty-one percent of journals were considered to be potentially predatory ; 94% of them were included in the ICMJE-R list in 2014-2018. Half were published in the United States and 62% were devoted to medicine. Adherence to five of the six policies/requirements was infrequent, ranging from 51% (plagiarism) to 7% (trial registration). Seventy-two percent of journals mentioned a policy on authors’ conflicts of interest. Information on article processing charge was available for 76% journals and could not be found for 22%. Authorship policy/ instructions were significantly more present in journals with publishers from India than from the USA (53% vs 30% ; p = 0.047), with no differences in the other five policies. Conclusion. Predatory journals should be deleted from the ICMJE-R list of followers to prevent misleading authors. ICMJE-R following journals need to be reevaluated with pre-defined published criteria.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE