Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1240759
“Should we get support or just guidelines?” (self) assessment on mentoring of early childhood education students
“Should we get support or just guidelines?” (self) assessment on mentoring of early childhood education students // International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 11 (2022), 3; 262-273 doi:10.1108/IJMCE-03-2021-0048 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1240759 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
“Should we get support or just
guidelines?” (self) assessment
on mentoring of early childhood
education students
Autori
Višnjić Jevtić, Adrijana ; Rogulj, Edita
Izvornik
International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education (2046-6854) 11
(2022), 3;
262-273
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Mentors, Practical training, Support, Students, Teacher education, Teaching practicum
Sažetak
Purpose – The aim of this research was to find out students’ and mentors’ attitudes toward the quality of mentoring support during teaching practicums. The research sought to determine whether there is any difference in (self) assessment between teacher mentors and early childhood education students. Design/methodology/approach – Through the quantitative research methodology, the Crisp (2009) College Student Mentoring Scale (CSMS) instrument was used to assess the quality of mentoring support during teaching practicums. Assessments were made in relation to the following variables: support in the areas of psychological and emotional needs, support in professional development and the development of professional competencies and the role of mentors as models. Early childhood education students (n1 5 105) and mentors (n2 5 54) of teaching practicums at the Faculty of Teacher Education, University of Zagreb, participated in the research. Findings – The results of the research show that there is a statistically significant difference between student assessments and mentor self-assessment with regard to all researched areas of support. Mentors rated their mentoring skills higher than students did. Originality/value – An approach in which mentoring is assessed in the context of support to students in different areas (e.g. psychological, emotional, professional) is rarely used in early childhood teacher education. Results indicate the need for a systematic evaluation of mentoring and the design of programs to strengthen mentoring competences.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pedagogija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Učiteljski fakultet, Zagreb
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
- Scopus