Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1234734
Intraorbital foreign bodies: A radiological point of view
Intraorbital foreign bodies: A radiological point of view // ECR 2022 ; C-17257
Beč, 2022. str. 17257-17257 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, kratko priopćenje, stručni)
CROSBI ID: 1234734 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Intraorbital foreign bodies: A radiological point of
view
Autori
Klemencic, Antonio ; Smoljan, Mia ; Flegarić-Bradić, Mirjana ; Rihtar, Tamara
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, kratko priopćenje, stručni
Izvornik
ECR 2022 ; C-17257
/ - Beč, 2022, 17257-17257
Skup
European Congress of Radiology (ECR 2022)
Mjesto i datum
Beč, Austrija, 13.07.2022. - 17.07.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Eyes, CT, MR, Diagnostic procedure, Acute, Foreign bodies, Trauma
Sažetak
Learning objective: To give the pictorial examples and radiological features of the most common types of intraorbital foreign bodies (IOFB). Background:IOFB are common and occur at a frequency of once in every six cases of orbital trauma. Intraocular foreign body accompanies as many as 18 to 41 percent of all open eyeball injuries and thus represents a significant cause of ocular morbidity and blindness. The principal task of imaging is to confirm the presence of an IOFB, describe its number, position as well as composition, define the relationship with surrounding anatomical structures, and determine the extent of orbital trauma. Depending on the composition, the IOFB can be divided into metallic (such as iron, gold), non- metallic inorganic (e.g. glass, plastic), and organic (wood, bone). Most IOFB are associated with activities involving striking metal against metal, such as hammering or drilling. A detailed history of injury is an important initial step in the IOFB evaluation because the type of activity that led to the injury can help to determine the foreign body nature. CT is the gold standard when IOFB is suspected because it has high sensitivity, lack of contraindications, low cost and short examination times. Conventional radiography cannot rule out most potential IOFB and should not be used when IOFB is suspected. MRI is not recommended for initial evaluation of IOFB, but is useful when there is a negative CT finding and a high level of clinical suspicion
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
