Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1232835
Comparison of Two Exam Evaluation Methods for Objectivity
Comparison of Two Exam Evaluation Methods for Objectivity // Proceedings of International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology - 2022 / Dankers, Paul ; Koc, Mustafa ; Lutfi Ciddi, Mustafa (ur.).
Antalya: ISTES Organization, 2022. str. 158-168 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1232835 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of Two Exam Evaluation Methods for
Objectivity
Autori
Kolarec, Biserka ; Ninčević, Marina
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology - 2022
/ Dankers, Paul ; Koc, Mustafa ; Lutfi Ciddi, Mustafa - Antalya : ISTES Organization, 2022, 158-168
ISBN
978-1-952092-35-0
Skup
9th International Conference on Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (ICEMST 2022)
Mjesto i datum
Antlaya, Turska, 24.03.2022. - 27.03.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Exam evaluation ; Serial evaluation ; Parallel evaluation ; Paired samples analysis
Sažetak
The object of research is a statistics exam that contains problem tasks. One examiner performed two exam evaluation methods to repeatedly evaluate the exam. The goal was to compare the methods for objectivity. One of the two exam evaluation methods we call a serial evaluation method. The serial evaluation method assumes evaluation of all exam tasks of an individual student in sequential order, so evaluation “student by student”. Unlike that, a parallel evaluation method assumes the “task by task” evaluation of exams for the whole group of students. A paired samples analysis of exam results indicates a statistically significant difference between methods. Further analysis showed a statistically significant difference in results obtained by the serial evaluation and the repeated serial evaluation, while the difference in results obtained by the parallel evaluation and the repeated parallel evaluation turned out not to be statistically significant. Furthermore, our research gave evidence that the repeated parallel evaluation changes result significantly less than the repeated serial evaluation. Consequently, we consider the parallel evaluation a more objective tool in exam evaluation than the serial evaluation.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Matematika, Pedagogija, Obrazovne znanosti (psihologija odgoja i obrazovanja, sociologija obrazovanja, politologija obrazovanja, ekonomika obrazovanja, antropologija obrazovanja, neuroznanost i rano učenje, pedagoške discipline)
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Agronomski fakultet, Zagreb