Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1231750
The Mystery of Intuition in Einstein’s Thought Experiments
The Mystery of Intuition in Einstein’s Thought Experiments // Croatian Journal of Philosophy (2023) (znanstveni, prihvaćen)
CROSBI ID: 1231750 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Mystery of Intuition in Einstein’s Thought
Experiments
Autori
Marko Grba
Vrsta, podvrsta
Radovi u časopisima,
znanstveni
Izvornik
Croatian Journal of Philosophy (2023)
Status rada
Prihvaćen
Ključne riječi
Einstein's thought experiments ; intuition ; reflective equilibrium ; Miščević' theory of TE's
Sažetak
The role of intuition in understanding in general and in scientific understanding in particular is still very much a subject of a lively philosophical discussion. The role of intuition in thought experimenting is much disputed in its own right, and the arguments range from those that deny any substantial role of intuition in the final inference that the thought experiment is meant to illustrate (eg. Norton or Williamson) to the pivotal role some form of intuition might play (eg. Brown or Miščević). So far, mostly Platonists were defenders of intuition, but in his recent book, Miščević takes on a formidable task to mount a defense of intuition as seen from a naturalist- evolutionist point of view and within his mental- modelling approach to thought experiments. I will, while acclaiming certain – and considerable – merits of his approach, nevertheless, insist that certain aspects of intuitive comprehending as it is meant to be going on in the process of thought experimenting remains inexplicable in the naturalist scheme such as Miščević’. The more mysterious (not to say Platonist) aspects of intuition will, hopefully, be revealed through the analyses of the two very famous thought experiments of Einstein which also figure quite importantly in his scientific opus. I will also have something to say about a few related problems as addressed by Miščević in his book regarding the description of thought experiment and more general imaginative enactments in thought as well as on whether there is an essential difference between scientific (primarily physical) and metaphysical thought experiments and other thought experiments or related modes of thinking.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus