Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1230321
Does Team Collective Efficacy Attenuate Negative Coaching Behaviour and Mediate the Effect of Legitimacy of Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Negative Coaching Behaviour?
Does Team Collective Efficacy Attenuate Negative Coaching Behaviour and Mediate the Effect of Legitimacy of Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Negative Coaching Behaviour? // Current Trends in Psychology 2021
Novi Sad, Srbija, 2021. str. 233-234 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1230321 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Does Team Collective Efficacy Attenuate Negative
Coaching Behaviour and Mediate the Effect of
Legitimacy of Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Negative
Coaching Behaviour?
Autori
Glavaš, Dragan ; Vrselja, Ivana ; Franjić, Petra ; Slaviček Esmeralda ; Širjan, Dijana
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
Current Trends in Psychology 2021
Mjesto i datum
Novi Sad, Srbija, 28-30.10.2021
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
Negative Coaching Behaviour, Collective Efficacy, Unsportsmanlike Conduct, Handball
Sažetak
Negative coaching behaviour can often go under the radar, especially in the case of team success. It can also be reinforced with the unsportsmanlike conduct of team members. On the other hand, team efficiency may absorb negative coaching behaviour and mediate the effect of the legitimacy of unsportsmanlike conduct on negative coaching behaviour. Thus, this research aimed to explore the mediating role of collective efficacy in the relationship between unsportsmanlike conduct of handball players and negative coaching behaviour. One hundred and seventy handball players aged 18 to 35 years (Mage = 21.45 years, SD = 3.21 years ; 61 male, 109 female) completed online questionnaires measuring Perceived Legitimacy of Unsportsmanlike Behaviour, Negative Coaching Behaviour, and Observational Collective Efficacy. Mediation analysis showed that higher collective efficacy predicted less negative coach behaviour and mediated the relationship between the legitimacy of serious fouls and negative coach behaviour, b = .17 [.01, .45]. Higher scores on the perceived legitimacy of serious fouls predicted lower collective efficacy, b = -.56 [-1.01, -.11], which then predicted more negative coaching behaviour, b = -.31 [-.56, -.06]. The mediation role of collective efficacy in the relationship between less serious fouls and negative coach behaviour as well as between legitimacy of verbal aggression and negative coach behaviour was not significant. Direct effects found showed that higher legitimacy of serious fouls, b = .72 [.03 1.47], and higher legitimacy of verbal aggression, b = .66 [.20, 1.11], predicted negative coach behaviour, while higher legitimacy of less serious fouls marginally predicted negative coach behaviour b = .23 [-.02, 0.48]. The findings suggest that collective efficacy may determine the path between the legitimacy of severe fouls and negative coach behaviour. On the other hand, the results indicated that other mechanisms than collective efficiency might mediate the effect of the legitimacy of less severe and less aggressive unsportsmanlike conduct, such as the legitimacy of less serious fouls and verbal aggression, on negative coach behaviour. The results are discussed within the theoretical and empirical challenges to detect constructs that can attenuate negative coaching behaviour and adverse effects of team and individual factors that may spark it.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija, Kineziologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Hrvatsko katoličko sveučilište, Zagreb