Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1230030
Non-invasive prenatal testing in the screening of the most common aneuploidies: our experience
Non-invasive prenatal testing in the screening of the most common aneuploidies: our experience // The 9th World Congress on Controversies in Preconception, Preimplantation and Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis (CoGen)
online konferencija, 2022. str. 1-1 (poster, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1230030 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Non-invasive prenatal testing in the screening of
the most common aneuploidies: our experience
Autori
Barišić, Anita ; Tadić, Ana ; Vraneković, Jadranka
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Skup
The 9th World Congress on Controversies in Preconception, Preimplantation and Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis (CoGen)
Mjesto i datum
Online konferencija, 04-05.11.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
aneuploidies ; invasive methods ; NIPT ; non-invasive methods ; prenatal diagnosis
Sažetak
Background: Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomopathies is an indispensable part of prenatal care and is performed in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. It includes a range of invasive and non-invasive methods. Non- invasive screening methods are used to determine the risk of aneuploidies in the fetus, while invasive methods can be used to diagnostically confirm chromosomal abnormalities. A noninvasive method of prenatal screening that can reliably determine the risk of the most common chromosomal aneuploidies is noninvasive prenatal testing of cell-free circulating fetal DNA from maternal blood (NIPT). Aim: The aim of this study was to present the results of NIPT analyses performed at the Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, in the period from January 2019 to August 2022, and to compare the obtained results with karyotype analyses. Patients and methods: During this period, NIPT analyses of 80 pregnant women were performed, with a significant annual increase in the number of subjects. Results: No statistically significant association was found between the proportion of fetal fraction and gestational week, body mass index, and maternal age. NIPT was an independent indication for amniotic fluid cytogenetic analysis in 49% of cases, followed by a combination of NIPT and ultrasound and a combination of NIPT and maternal age. The combination of NIPT and ultrasound had the highest accuracy in assessing the risk of fetal aneuploidy. Conclusion: NIPT analyses were most reliable in assessing risk for trisomy 21, especially in a combination with ultrasound, whereas it was less reliable in assessing sex chromosome aneuploidies.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Temeljne medicinske znanosti, Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Rijeka