Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1227755
Left vs. right radial approach for coronary catheterization: Relation to age and severe aortic stenosis
Left vs. right radial approach for coronary catheterization: Relation to age and severe aortic stenosis // Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9 (2022), 1022415, 8 doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.1022415 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1227755 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Left vs. right radial approach for coronary catheterization: Relation to
age and severe aortic stenosis
Autori
Will, Maximilian ; Weiss, Thomas W ; Weber, Michael ; Kwok, Chun Shing ; Borovac, Josip Anđelo ; Lamm, Gudrun ; Unterdechler, Markus ; Aufhauser, Simone ; Nolan, Jim ; Mascherbauer, Julia ; Schwarz, Konstantin
Izvornik
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (2297-055X) 9
(2022);
1022415, 8
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
coronary angiography ; CAG ; radial access ; transradial access ; aortic unfolding ; elderly patients ; aortic stenosis ; AS ; aortic calcification ; calcification ; diagnostic catheterisation ; older age ; advanced age ; access complications ; interventional cardiology ; invasive cardiology ; elderly
Sažetak
Background: Old age and the presence of aortic stenosis are associated with the unfolding of the intrathoracic aorta. This may result in increased difficulties navigating catheters from the right compared to the left radial approach. Objective: To investigate whether increasing age or presence of severe aortic stenosis was associated with increased catheterization success rates from left (LRA) compared to right radial artery approach (RRA). Methods: We compared coronary angiography success rates of RRA and LRA according to different age groups and in a subgroup of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Results: A total of 21, 259 coronary angiographies were evaluated. With increasing age, the first pass success rate from either radial access decreased significantly (p < 0.001). In patients aged <85 years, there was no difference between LRA and RRA. However, in patients aged ≥85 years, LRA was associated with significantly higher success rates compared to RRA (90.1 vs. 82.8%, p = 0.003). Patients aged ≥85 years received less contrast agent and had shorter fluoroscopy time when LRA was used [86.6 ± 41.1 vs. 99.6 ± 48.7 ml (p < 0.001) and 4.5 ± 4.1 min vs. 6.2 ± 5.7 min (p < 0.001), mean (±SD)]. In patients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 589) better first pass success rates were observed via LRA compared to the RRA route (91.9 vs. 85.1%, p = 0.037). Conclusion: LRA, compared to RRA, is associated with a higher first- pass catheter success rate for coronary artery angiography in patients aged ≥85 years and those with severe aortic stenosis.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Sveučilište u Splitu Sveučilišni odjel zdravstvenih studija
Profili:
Josip Anđelo Borovac
(autor)
Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:
Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi www.frontiersin.org www.frontiersin.orgCitiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus