Naslov
4-Years Clinical Performance of Glass-Hybrid and Composite in Multi-Center Trial

Autori
Miletić, Ivana ; Baraba, Anja ; Basso, Mateo ; Pulcini, Maria Giulia ; Perić, Tamara ; Marković, Dejan ; Ozkaya, Cigdem A. ; Turkun, L. Sebnem

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni

Izvornik
PAN European region of the international association for dental research congress: abstract book / - Marseille, 2022, 308-308

Skup
PER-IADR Oral Health Research Congress

Mjesto i datum
Marseille, Francuska, 15.09.2022. - 17.09.2022

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Poster

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
clinical trial ; glass hybrides ; composites ; color stability

Sažetak
Objectives This multi-centre study aimed to establish whether a glass-hybrid restorative system has clinical outcomes comparable to a nano- hybrid resin composite 4-year after the restoration of moderate to large twosurface cavities. Methods The study had a longitudinal (4 years follow-up), multicentric (dental schools in Zagreb, Croatia ; Milan, Italy ; Izmir, Turkey, and Belgrade, Serbia), and split-mouth design. A total of 180 patients requiring two restorations on molar teeth in the same jaw were recruited in each centre and a total of 360 two- surface restorations were placed: each patient received a glass-hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte, GC, Japan) and a resin composite restoration (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar, Liechtenstein). Each restoration was independently evaluated by two clinicians at baseline, after one, two, three and four years. Aesthetic, functional, and biological performance was scored using FDI-2 criteria and compared using a nonparametric sign test. Survival curves for both materials were compared using the stratified test for matched pairs (p<0.05). Results At the 4-year recall, the success rates for the materials were 84.0 and 90.8, and survival rates were 94.6 and 94.4 respectively for EQUIA Forte and Tetric EvoCeram (p>0.05). Regarding the performance of the restorations according to the FDI-2 criteria, there were no statistically significant differences between the materials for biological performance (overall biological performance excellent/very good scores EQUIA Forte 90.7%, Tetric EvoCeram 89.8%). The functional properties showed no statistically significant differences at 4- year recall (overall functional scores excellent/very good EQUIA Forte 58.3%, Tetric EvoCeram 55.6%). Regarding the aesthetic criteria, EQUIA Forte has shown significantly better performance p<0.001 regarding staining surface (84.3% vs. 74.1% excellent/very good), staining margin (74.1% vs. 53.7% excellent/very good, p=0.03) and overall aesthetic properties (69.4% vs 49.1%, p<0.001). Conclusions Glass- hybrid restorative system has shown to have a satisfactory performance in large two-surface restorations of molar teeth during the long clinical evaluation of 4-year.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Dentalna medicina

POVEZANOST RADA