Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1227100

Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions?


Vilizzi, Lorenzo; Piria, Marina; Copp, H.Gordon
Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions? // Management of Biological Invasions, 13 (2022), 1-16 doi:10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1227100 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions?

Autori
Vilizzi, Lorenzo ; Piria, Marina ; Copp, H.Gordon

Izvornik
Management of Biological Invasions (1989-8649) 13 (2022); 1-16

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni

Ključne riječi
AS-ISK ; TAS-ISK ; basic risk assessment ; climate change ; risk ranking ; risk screening ; alien species

Sažetak
Score-based decision-support tools are ncreasingly used to identify potentially invasive non-native species as part of the risk screening (initial risk identification) component of non-native species risk analysis. Amongst these tools are the Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) and its derivatives, e.g. the Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (ASISK), which have been extensively used on a large variety of terrestrial and aquatic plants and of aquatic animals worldwide. In this paper, a correction is made to the previous guidance on the use of two separate thresholds to risk-rank species, i.e. one for current climate conditions (basic risk assessment: BRA threshold) and one for future climate conditions (BRA + climate change assessment: BRA+CCA threshold). Re-evaluation of this practice reveals that, to avoid the incorrect risk-ranking of species, only the BRA threshold should be used in all future applications of WRAtype toolkits that include a separate set of climate-change questions – at present, this involves the AS-ISK and the newly released Terrestrial Animal Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (TAS-ISK). As a result of this revised guidance, all published studies containing AS-ISK applications to date are reviewed here, and where appropriate corrected risk ranks are provided for species that were risk-ranked using a BRA+CCA threshold. Corrections are also made whenever applicable to published errors or incorrect risk ranks based on the BRA threshold in the AS-ISK applications reviewed.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Biologija, Biotehnologija



POVEZANOST RADA


Profili:

Avatar Url Marina Piria (autor)

Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:

Pristup cjelovitom tekstu rada doi

Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Vilizzi, Lorenzo; Piria, Marina; Copp, H.Gordon
Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions? // Management of Biological Invasions, 13 (2022), 1-16 doi:10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
Vilizzi, L., Piria, M. & Copp, H. (2022) Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions?. Management of Biological Invasions, 13, 1-16 doi:10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01.
@article{article, author = {Vilizzi, Lorenzo and Piria, Marina and Copp, H.Gordon}, year = {2022}, pages = {1-16}, DOI = {10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01}, keywords = {AS-ISK, TAS-ISK, basic risk assessment, climate change, risk ranking, risk screening, alien species}, journal = {Management of Biological Invasions}, doi = {10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01}, volume = {13}, issn = {1989-8649}, title = {Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions?}, keyword = {AS-ISK, TAS-ISK, basic risk assessment, climate change, risk ranking, risk screening, alien species} }
@article{article, author = {Vilizzi, Lorenzo and Piria, Marina and Copp, H.Gordon}, year = {2022}, pages = {1-16}, DOI = {10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01}, keywords = {AS-ISK, TAS-ISK, basic risk assessment, climate change, risk ranking, risk screening, alien species}, journal = {Management of Biological Invasions}, doi = {10.3391/mbi.2022.13.4.01}, volume = {13}, issn = {1989-8649}, title = {Which calibrated threshold is appropriate for ranking non-native species using scores generated by WRA-type screening toolkits that assess risks under both current and future climate conditions?}, keyword = {AS-ISK, TAS-ISK, basic risk assessment, climate change, risk ranking, risk screening, alien species} }

Časopis indeksira:


  • Current Contents Connect (CCC)
  • Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
    • Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
    • Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
    • SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
  • Scopus


Citati:





    Contrast
    Increase Font
    Decrease Font
    Dyslexic Font