Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1225611
Norms, counter-norms, and ontological proof
Norms, counter-norms, and ontological proof // Formal Methods and Science in Philosophy IV: Abstracts / Kovač, Srećko ; Swietorzecka, Kordula (ur.).
Zagreb: Institut za filozofiju, 2022. str. 21-22 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1225611 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Norms, counter-norms, and ontological proof
Autori
Kovač, Srećko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Formal Methods and Science in Philosophy IV: Abstracts
/ Kovač, Srećko ; Swietorzecka, Kordula - Zagreb : Institut za filozofiju, 2022, 21-22
Skup
Formal Methods and Science in Philosophy IV
Mjesto i datum
Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 21.04.2022. - 23.04.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
B. Žarnić ; obligation norm set ; counter-set ; perfections ; positivity ; counter-positivity
(obligation norm set ; counter-set ; B. Žarnić ; perfections ; positivity ; counter-positivity)
Sažetak
One of the topics Berislav Žarnić was focused on in his last papers was the discussion and formalization of von Wright’s view according to which normative possibility (permission) is not interdefinable with obligation (Pφ non-equivalent with ¬O¬φ). To formalize this “conceptual” independecy of permission, Žarnić uses a two-sets approach: N is the set of obligations (theory), and N is the relatively independent, non-dual, counter-set of the negated permissions (counter- theory). In his approach, Žarnić was partly inspired by the controversies on Gödel’s ontological proof, where the secondorder property of “positivity” (P) has a key role. We adjust this approach to the setting of Gödel’s ontotheology by introducing the concept of “nonpositivity” (P) as conceptually independent from “positivity”. To make our normative behavior (for example, our acting according to imperatives) meaningful, we add a conceptually independent counter-theory of non-positivity (including, for example, “modal collapse”, Barcan formula and its converse) instead of revising Gödel’s system GO. Non- positivity basically behaves as Žarnić’s “weak ideal” (closure under conjuncts and implicants). The theory of positivity and the counter-theory of non-positivity can together form a paraconsistent” system, in accordance with Žarnić’s proposed convention that, in case of normative inconsistency, what a norm recipient should do is to change his/her logic.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija
