Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1219484
International law of interpretation: an ambiguous response to ambiguity
International law of interpretation: an ambiguous response to ambiguity, 2006. (ekspertiza).
CROSBI ID: 1219484 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
International law of interpretation: an ambiguous
response to ambiguity
Autori
Pehar, Dražen
Izvornik
Journal of diplomatic language
Vrsta, podvrsta
Ostale vrste radova, ekspertiza
Godina
2006
Ključne riječi
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties ; interpretation articles ; legal/treaty interpretation
Sažetak
The paper explores the two 'interpretation' articles of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Arts 31 and 32. Drawing on the details of the long negotiating process that led to adoption of the two articles, it makes the case for the thesis that the 'interpretation' articles are themselves ambiguous and/or widely open to interpretation. The argument's explanatory worth consists primarily in its ability to explain the international legal conflicts over the meaning of the 31 and 32, for instance at the International Court of Justice, as well as in its ability to make sense of some apparently incoherent scholarly comments on the two articles. In the author's opinion, the main moral of the argument is that, in our dealing with the problem of diplomatic/legal/international- political ambiguity, we need to move beyond the '(compulsory) rules of interpretation' approach.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo, Politologija, Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti, Interdisciplinarne društvene znanosti, Kognitivna znanost (prirodne, tehničke, biomedicina i zdravstvo, društvene i humanističke znanosti)
Napomena
The Journal of diplomatic language was an e-journal
based on the American University-Paris (ed. Harold
Bashor).