Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1217434
Comparison of arthroscopy versus percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for the management of intra- and juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteoma: case series and a literature review
Comparison of arthroscopy versus percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation for the management of intra- and juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteoma: case series and a literature review // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23 (2022), 1; 287, 15 doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05244-6 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1217434 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparison of arthroscopy versus percutaneous
radiofrequency thermal ablation for the management of intra- and
juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteoma: case series and a literature
review
Autori
Knežević, Igor ; Bojanić, Ivan
Izvornik
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (1471-2474) 23
(2022), 1;
287, 15
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
Elbow ; Arthroscopy ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Intra-articular ; Tumours ; Benign neoplasms ; Osteoid osteoma
Sažetak
Background: Today, intra-articular and juxta- articular osteoid osteomas are treated with arthroscopy and radiof- requency thermal ablation. However, for the case of an elbow joint, arguments are made for the use of a minimally invasive technique to be the optimal choice. This study aims to analyse our experiences of arthroscopically treated elbow osteoid osteomas and to compare it with the published results of both techniques. Methods: The retrospective study analyses the patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy ablation of an elbow osteoid osteoma at a single institution from January 2014 until March 2020. Clinical and diagnostic features, success and treatment failure rates, complications and tumour recurrence rates were all compared to 13 studies of intra- articular elbow osteoid osteoma arthroscopic ablation and 15 studies involving radiofrequency thermal ablation of intra-articular osteoid osteoma within different joints. Results: Four males and two females, with a mean age of 19.3 years, were encompassed. All the patients had immediate postoperative pain relief and improved range of motion. No tumour recurrences were observed during a median of 21.7 months. The literature review yielded 86.4% success rate, 68.2% successful biopsies, one minor complication and no recurrences following the arthroscopic ablation of an elbow osteoid osteoma ; while radiofrequency thermal ablation of an intra-articular elbow osteoid osteoma yielded 96.3% success rate, 33.3% successful biopsies, no complications and 3.7% recurrence rate. Conclusions: Our results are consistent with the published literature proving that arthroscopic ablation is an efficient method with low treatment failure rates and no recurrences in treating intra- and juxta-articular elbow osteoid osteomas. Advantages of arthroscopic ablation stem from the ability to visualise and safely deal with the lesion and the joint’s reactive changes resulting in high biopsy rates, no recurrences and better postoperative elbow’s range of motion. Still, the technique selection should be personalised considering the medical expertise of every institution.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Medicinski fakultet, Zagreb,
Klinički bolnički centar Zagreb
Poveznice na cjeloviti tekst rada:
doi bmcmusculoskeletdisord.biomedcentral.com www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govCitiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE