Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1212367
The Destiny of Scientific Theories: Oparin Coacervate Theory Case
The Destiny of Scientific Theories: Oparin Coacervate Theory Case // Abstract Book: 4th Annual International Conference on Sciences / Tratras Contis, Ellene ; Gkounta, Olga (ur.).
Atena: Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), 2022. str. 48-48 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, sažetak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1212367 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
The Destiny of Scientific Theories: Oparin
Coacervate Theory Case
Autori
Kokić, Tonći
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, sažetak, znanstveni
Izvornik
Abstract Book: 4th Annual International Conference on Sciences
/ Tratras Contis, Ellene ; Gkounta, Olga - Atena : Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), 2022, 48-48
ISBN
978-960-598-519-6
Skup
4th Annual International Conference on Sciences
Mjesto i datum
Atena, Grčka, 18.07.2022. - 21.07.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
znanstvene teorije ; Oparinova teorija
(Scientific Theories ; Oparin Theory)
Sažetak
The scientific theories are subject to change: this means that (1) sometimes a theory does not represent the best current knowledge about a specific phenomenon anymore and has to be abandoned, (2) sometimes a theory loses parts of its scope and relevance, or (3) its elements need improvements according to new scientific insight and can be repaired. The example of the first is superseded Stahl’s phlogiston theory, the second is classical causal classic physics, powerless in regard to the explanation of quantum phenomena limited to submicroscopic phenomena and probabilistic predictions, and the numerous models of atoms could be seen as an example of the third kind of the destiny scientific theory. A rejected theory is at fault because its propositions do not correspond to facts and/or is not very well supported by other scientific theories or when there is no successful prediction. In the two other cases, theories continue their existence. The Oparin hypothesis is located on the first of these possibilities: some of its premises are not known or definite (prebiotic soup, the long period of times needed for the emergence of life), some of them are even rejected (the coacervate) and recreation of life based on this hypothesis faulted. The Oparin hypothesis is restricted to the very narrow area of the possible prebiotic synthesis of the macromolecules we find in living systems and it did not decrease the most important gap between the most complicated organic substances and the most primitive living organisms.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Filozofija
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
VLASTITA-SREDSTVA-FFST-INST-2020-23 - Teorije o postanku života (Kokić, Tonći, VLASTITA-SREDSTVA - Institucijski projekt) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet u Splitu
Profili:
Tonći Kokić
(autor)