Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1209099
Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers
Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (2022), 13; 7588, 25 doi:10.3390/ijerph19137588 (međunarodna recenzija, pregledni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1209099 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients:
A Review Focusing on Hairdressers
Autori
Symanzik, Cara ; Weinert, Patricia ; Babić, Željka ; Hallmann, Sarah ; Havmose, S Martin ; Johansen, D Jeanne ; Kezic, Sanja ; Macan, Marija ; Macan, Jelena ; Strahwald Julia ; Turk, Rajka ; van der Molen, F Henk ; John, M Swen ; Uter, Wolfgang
Izvornik
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (1660-4601) 19
(2022), 13;
7588, 25
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, pregledni rad, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
cysteamine hydrochloride ; cocamide diethanolamine ; cocamidopropyl betaine ; cosmetics ; hairdresser ; hairdressing ; hand eczema ; polyvinylpyrrolidone ; polyvinylpyrrolidone copolymers ; sodium laureth sulfate
Sažetak
The safety assessment of cosmetics considers the exposure of a ‘common consumer’, not the occupational exposure of hairdressers. This review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding the skin toxicity of cysteamine hydrochloride (cysteamine HCl ; CAS no. 156-57-0), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP ; CAS no. 9003-39-8), PVP copolymers (CAS no. 28211-18-9), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES ; CAS no. 9004-82-4), cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA ; CAS no. 68603-42-9), and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB ; CAS no. 61789- 40-0). A total of 298 articles were identified, of which 70 were included. Meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers have a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing a contact allergy to CAPB compared to controls who are not hairdressers. Hairdressers might have a higher risk of acquiring quantum sensitization against cysteamine HCl compared to a consumer because of their job responsibilities. Regarding cocamide DEA, the irritant potential of this surfactant should not be overlooked. Original articles for PVP, PVP copolymers, and SLES are lacking. This systematic review indicates that the current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers’ usage of hair cosmetics. The considerable irritant and/or allergenic potential of substances used in hair cosmetics should prompt a reassessment of current risk assessment practices.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti, Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Institut za medicinska istraživanja i medicinu rada, Zagreb
Profili:
Rajka Turk
(autor)
Jelena Macan
(autor)
Marija Macan
(autor)
Sanja Kežić
(autor)
Željka Babić
(autor)
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE