Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1206948
Training of adult psychiatrists and child and adolescent psychiatrists in europe: a systematic review of training characteristics and transition from child/adolescent to adult mental health services
Training of adult psychiatrists and child and adolescent psychiatrists in europe: a systematic review of training characteristics and transition from child/adolescent to adult mental health services // BMC Medical Education, 19 (2019), 1; 1576-1600 doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1576-0 (međunarodna recenzija, članak, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1206948 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Training of adult psychiatrists and child and
adolescent psychiatrists in europe: a systematic
review of training characteristics and transition
from child/adolescent to adult mental health
services
Autori
Russet, Frederick ; … ; Dodig-Curkovic, Katarina ; Kovac, Vlatka ; … ; Franic, Tomislav ; Davidovic, Nikolina ; … ; Gerritsen, Suzanne
Kolaboracija
Milestone Consortium
Izvornik
BMC Medical Education (1472-6920) 19
(2019), 1;
1576-1600
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u časopisima, članak, znanstveni
Ključne riječi
transition, adult psychiatrist, child psychiatrist
(transition, child psychiatrist, adult psychiatrist)
Sažetak
Background Profound clinical, conceptual and ideological differences between child and adult mental health service models contribute to transition-related discontinuity of care. Many of these may be related to psychiatry training. Methods A systematic review on General Adult Psychiatry (GAP) and Child and Adult Psychiatry (CAP) training in Europe, with a particular focus on transition as a theme in GAP and CAP training. Results Thirty-four full-papers, six abstracts and seven additional full text documents were identified. Important variations between countries were found across several domains including assessment of trainees, clinical and educational supervision, psychotherapy training and continuing medical education. Three models of training were identified: i) a generalist common training programme ; ii) totally separate training programmes ; iii) mixed types. Only two national training programs (UK and Ireland) were identified to have addressed transition as a topic, both involving CAP exclusively. Conclusion Three models of training in GAP and CAP across Europe are identified, suggesting that the harmonization is not yet realised and a possible barrier to improving transitional care. Training in transition has only recently been considered. It is timely, topical and important to develop evidence-based training approaches on transitional care across Europe into both CAP and GAP training.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Kliničke medicinske znanosti
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Klinički bolnički centar Osijek,
KBC Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Split,
Medicinski fakultet, Osijek
Citiraj ovu publikaciju:
Časopis indeksira:
- Current Contents Connect (CCC)
- Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC)
- Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXP)
- Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
- SCI-EXP, SSCI i/ili A&HCI
- Scopus
- MEDLINE