Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1204314
Who is Guilty and Who is Responsible in the Croatian Parliament: A Linguistic Approach
Who is Guilty and Who is Responsible in the Croatian Parliament: A Linguistic Approach // Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data / Misuraca, Michelangelo ; Scepi, Germana ; Spano, Maria (ur.).
Napulj: Vadistat Press, 2022. str. 503-510 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1204314 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Who is Guilty and Who is Responsible in the Croatian
Parliament: A Linguistic Approach
Autori
Kocijan, Kristina ; Šojat, Krešimir
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data
/ Misuraca, Michelangelo ; Scepi, Germana ; Spano, Maria - Napulj : Vadistat Press, 2022, 503-510
ISBN
979-12-80153-30-2
Skup
16th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data
Mjesto i datum
Napulj, Italija, 06.07.2022. - 08.07.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
political discourse ; PDA ; digital humanities ; syntactic grammar ; Croatian ; NooJ
Sažetak
From a psychological perspective, there is a difference between the terms kriv ‘guilty’ and odgovoran ‘responsible’ in that the former term conveys negative emotion and supports a predominantly passive state of being, while the latter conveys positive emotion and encourages (endorses) more active and stimulating circumstances. One’s choice of term may greatly influence the communication process. It may, on one hand, bring further disruption between the sender of the communication and its receivers or, on the other hand, help them find the same path to a recovery process. This is even more important when the senders and receivers of the communication are representatives of a larger group of people, as is the case with Members of Parliament. The aim of this study is to gain insight about the political discourse in the Croatian Parliament regarding the usage of the concepts of ‘guilt’ vs. ‘responsibility’, particularly whether their usage is dependent on the speaker’s gender and party preference. Therefore, we rely on a corpus with over 127 million tokens. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis are facilitated with a syntactic grammar designed within the NooJ NLP environment.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Informacijske i komunikacijske znanosti, Filologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb
