Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1202884
Scarcity, Taxes, and Telecom Infrastructure: An Uneasy Case for Easements
Scarcity, Taxes, and Telecom Infrastructure: An Uneasy Case for Easements // Association of Law, Property, and Society 8th Annual Meeting
Ann Arbor (MI), Sjedinjene Američke Države, 2017. (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1202884 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Scarcity, Taxes, and Telecom Infrastructure: An
Uneasy Case for Easements
Autori
Ernst, Hano
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Sažeci sa skupova, neobjavljeni rad, znanstveni
Skup
Association of Law, Property, and Society 8th Annual Meeting
Mjesto i datum
Ann Arbor (MI), Sjedinjene Američke Države, 18.05.2017. - 20.05.2017
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
telecom, infrastructure, easements, tax law, property
Sažetak
The long-term goals of telecommunications liberalization strategies such as promoting competition and network development, as well as advances in technology have put pressures on land supporting additional or upgraded infrastructure. Scarcity of rights-of-way coupled with owner easement fatigue have led to tensions between municipalities, private owners, and telecoms in securing and designing telecom easements. This paper traces the development of different analytic schemes underlying these relationships in E.U. and U.S. law, and develops a theory that attempts to explain their different approaches. I first look at E.U. telecom authorization regulation and case law covering facilities installation fees, which, albeit required to reflect the optimal use of rights-of-way as scarce resources, has remained reluctant to take on traditional takings doctrines and acquiesced to a taxation-based approach to municipal compensation schemes. I then look at U.S. law, which, after an extensive period of application of Section 253 of the Telecommunications Act preserving State and local government power over fair and reasonable compensation for use of public rights-of-way remains divided as to its interpretation. By comparing the different narratives in E.U. and U.S. law, I assess their possible cross- applications, as well as discuss core line-drawing issues including public vs. private property, and takings vs. taxation. Finally, in the context of privately owned land, the paper looks at difficulties in easement valuation, as well as the relationship between owners, right-of-way holders and telecoms in cases of apportionment.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Pravo
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Pravni fakultet, Zagreb,
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
Profili:
Hano Ernst
(autor)