Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1199585
Empirical overlap and predictive validity of Big Five and HEXACO personality models
Empirical overlap and predictive validity of Big Five and HEXACO personality models // 21nd Psychology days in Zadar: Book of Selected Proceedings / Pavela Banai, Irena (ur.).
Zadar: Morepress, 2022. str. 121-132 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1199585 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Empirical overlap and predictive validity of Big
Five and HEXACO personality models
Autori
Pocrnić, Martina ; Butković, Ana ; Vukasović Hlupić, Tena ; Bratko, Denis
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Izvornik
21nd Psychology days in Zadar: Book of Selected Proceedings
/ Pavela Banai, Irena - Zadar : Morepress, 2022, 121-132
ISBN
978-953-331-372-6
Skup
22. Dani psihologije u Zadru
Mjesto i datum
Zadar, Hrvatska, 01.10.2020. - 03.10.2020
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
personality, Big Five, BFI, HEXACO, subjective happiness, GPA
Sažetak
In the field of personality research, there has long been a consensus that personality structure is best captured with five broad factors. However, another model, HEXACO with six factors, is increasingly used. We aimed to in-vestigate the overlap between those personality models, as well as their predictive validity for relevant outcomes. A total of 132 psychology students (81.8% women, Mage = 23.33, SD = 1.31) filled in HEXACO-60, BFI, Subjective Happiness Scale and reported their grade-point average (sGPA). Results of 11 multiple regression analyses, in which five BFI scales predicted each of the six HEXACO-60 scales and vice versa, showed that BFI scales do not capture variance of HEXACO Honesty-Humility (R2adj = .08) and Emotionality (R2adj = .36) factors well. Regard-ing predictive validity, both BFI and HEXACO significantly predicted variance of subjective happiness, but BFI explained the larger amount than HEXACO, while only BFI scales captured a significant amount of sGPA variance. Therefore, findings of this study suggest that BFI scales do not capture all HEXACO variance well, but the results of the predictive validity comparison indicate that we cannot definitively conclude that one model is better than the other.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Psihologija
POVEZANOST RADA
Ustanove:
Filozofski fakultet, Zagreb