Pretražite po imenu i prezimenu autora, mentora, urednika, prevoditelja

Napredna pretraga

Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1198483

Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments


Horvat, Nikola; Martinec, Tomislav; Perišić, Marija Majda; Škec, Stanko
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments // 32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference
Pariz, Francuska, 2022. TBA, 6 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)


CROSBI ID: 1198483 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca

Naslov
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments

Autori
Horvat, Nikola ; Martinec, Tomislav ; Perišić, Marija Majda ; Škec, Stanko

Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni

Skup
32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference

Mjesto i datum
Pariz, Francuska, 28.03.2022. - 30.03.2022

Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje

Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija

Ključne riječi
design reviews ; virtual teams ; collaborative CAD ; virtual reality ; design issues ; design errors

Sažetak
Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) such as virtual reality (VR) technologies have great potential to support design reviews. They enable users to view a design (solution) under review and simultaneously represent team members with social cues such as avatars. However, while CVEs are promising for design practice and education, it is still unclear how they affect review outcomes. This study presents an experiment that compares 10 three-member teams during design review sessions conducted within two different CVEs. The first CVE is non-immersive, that is, a collaborative computer-aided design (CAD) tool used on a conventional desktop interface, while the second CVE is immersive and employs three head-mounted display VR headsets. The results show that teams in immersive CVE identify fewer issues than the teams in non-immersive CVE. Furthermore, although the reviewed designs exhibit a similar level of complexity, the results show that the distribution of issues in immersive CVE was slightly different than the distribution in non-immersive CVE. These results suggest that teams might perform better when using collaborative CAD than collaborative VR when the review goal is to identify as many issues as possible. However, the decision on which CVE to employ should depend on the design under review, as the two technologies might support reviews of different types of designs.

Izvorni jezik
Engleski

Znanstvena područja
Strojarstvo



POVEZANOST RADA


Projekti:
IP-2018-01-7269 - Timska adaptabilnost u razvoju inovativnih proizvoda (TAIDE) (Štorga, Mario, HRZZ - 2018-01) ( CroRIS)

Ustanove:
Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje, Zagreb


Citiraj ovu publikaciju:

Horvat, Nikola; Martinec, Tomislav; Perišić, Marija Majda; Škec, Stanko
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments // 32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference
Pariz, Francuska, 2022. TBA, 6 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
Horvat, N., Martinec, T., Perišić, M. & Škec, S. (2022) Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments. U: 32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference.
@article{article, author = {Horvat, Nikola and Martinec, Tomislav and Peri\v{s}i\'{c}, Marija Majda and \v{S}kec, Stanko}, year = {2022}, pages = {6}, chapter = {TBA}, keywords = {design reviews, virtual teams, collaborative CAD, virtual reality, design issues, design errors}, title = {Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments}, keyword = {design reviews, virtual teams, collaborative CAD, virtual reality, design issues, design errors}, publisherplace = {Pariz, Francuska}, chapternumber = {TBA} }
@article{article, author = {Horvat, Nikola and Martinec, Tomislav and Peri\v{s}i\'{c}, Marija Majda and \v{S}kec, Stanko}, year = {2022}, pages = {6}, chapter = {TBA}, keywords = {design reviews, virtual teams, collaborative CAD, virtual reality, design issues, design errors}, title = {Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments}, keyword = {design reviews, virtual teams, collaborative CAD, virtual reality, design issues, design errors}, publisherplace = {Pariz, Francuska}, chapternumber = {TBA} }




Contrast
Increase Font
Decrease Font
Dyslexic Font