Pregled bibliografske jedinice broj: 1198483
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and non-immersive collaborative virtual environments // 32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference
Pariz, Francuska, 2022. TBA, 6 (predavanje, međunarodna recenzija, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni)
CROSBI ID: 1198483 Za ispravke kontaktirajte CROSBI podršku putem web obrasca
Naslov
Comparing design review outcomes in immersive and
non-immersive collaborative virtual environments
Autori
Horvat, Nikola ; Martinec, Tomislav ; Perišić, Marija Majda ; Škec, Stanko
Vrsta, podvrsta i kategorija rada
Radovi u zbornicima skupova, cjeloviti rad (in extenso), znanstveni
Skup
32nd CIRP DESIGN Conference
Mjesto i datum
Pariz, Francuska, 28.03.2022. - 30.03.2022
Vrsta sudjelovanja
Predavanje
Vrsta recenzije
Međunarodna recenzija
Ključne riječi
design reviews ; virtual teams ; collaborative CAD ; virtual reality ; design issues ; design errors
Sažetak
Collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) such as virtual reality (VR) technologies have great potential to support design reviews. They enable users to view a design (solution) under review and simultaneously represent team members with social cues such as avatars. However, while CVEs are promising for design practice and education, it is still unclear how they affect review outcomes. This study presents an experiment that compares 10 three-member teams during design review sessions conducted within two different CVEs. The first CVE is non-immersive, that is, a collaborative computer-aided design (CAD) tool used on a conventional desktop interface, while the second CVE is immersive and employs three head-mounted display VR headsets. The results show that teams in immersive CVE identify fewer issues than the teams in non-immersive CVE. Furthermore, although the reviewed designs exhibit a similar level of complexity, the results show that the distribution of issues in immersive CVE was slightly different than the distribution in non-immersive CVE. These results suggest that teams might perform better when using collaborative CAD than collaborative VR when the review goal is to identify as many issues as possible. However, the decision on which CVE to employ should depend on the design under review, as the two technologies might support reviews of different types of designs.
Izvorni jezik
Engleski
Znanstvena područja
Strojarstvo
POVEZANOST RADA
Projekti:
IP-2018-01-7269 - Timska adaptabilnost u razvoju inovativnih proizvoda (TAIDE) (Štorga, Mario, HRZZ - 2018-01) ( CroRIS)
Ustanove:
Fakultet strojarstva i brodogradnje, Zagreb
Profili:
Marija Majda Perišić
(autor)
Nikola Horvat
(autor)
Stanko Škec
(autor)
Tomislav Martinec
(autor)